diff --git a/supply-chain/imports.lock b/supply-chain/imports.lock
index f49cb3515..2d5314cb8 100644
--- a/supply-chain/imports.lock
+++ b/supply-chain/imports.lock
@@ -3123,7 +3123,7 @@ aggregated-from = "https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/third_p
 who = "Lukasz Anforowicz <lukasza@chromium.org>"
 criteria = "safe-to-deploy"
 delta = "1.14.0 -> 1.15.0"
-notes = "The delta in `lib.rs` only tweaks doc comments and `#[cfg(feature = \"std\")]`."
+notes = 'The delta in `lib.rs` only tweaks doc comments and `#[cfg(feature = "std")]`.'
 aggregated-from = "https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/third_party/rust/chromium_crates_io/supply-chain/audits.toml?format=TEXT"
 
 [[audits.google.audits.equivalent]]
@@ -3235,7 +3235,7 @@ who = "Lukasz Anforowicz <lukasza@chromium.org>"
 criteria = "safe-to-deploy"
 version = "0.5.2"
 notes = """
-Grepped for \"unsafe\", \"crypt\", \"cipher\", \"fs\", \"net\" - there were no
+Grepped for "unsafe", "crypt", "cipher", "fs", "net" - there were no
 hits except for 3 `unsafe impl bytemuck::SomeTrait for ...`.  Each `impl` had a
 reasonable safety comment and there were no actual `unsafe` blocks, so I think
 this can be treated as `ub-risk-1`.  Additional `unsafe` review comments can be
@@ -3689,8 +3689,8 @@ who = "Lukasz Anforowicz <lukasza@chromium.org>"
 criteria = "safe-to-deploy"
 version = "0.19.0"
 notes = """
-Grepped for \"unsafe\", \"crypt\", \"cipher\", \"fs\", \"net\" - there were no hits
-(except for benign \"fs\" hit in `skrifa-0.19.0/src/color/traversal_tests/mod.rs`).
+Grepped for "unsafe", "crypt", "cipher", "fs", "net" - there were no hits
+(except for benign "fs" hit in `skrifa-0.19.0/src/color/traversal_tests/mod.rs`).
 
 For overall `safe-to-deploy` and `does-not-implement-crypto` I am mostly
 relying on certification by the Chromium engineers who work on the library