Field/Type descriptions from schema could be added to the generated code.

[strue36]

This will presumably result in a similar discussion to this. jhnnsrs/turms#54

I've implemented this as docstrings on a local branch using similar logic to that used in turms.

[strue36]

I originally thought that this is what the include_comments flag was for.

[mat-sop]

I think optional descriptions could be added to the generated code, but first, we should clarify the include_comments description in the readme.

[mat-sop]

To give more context, we're using ast to generate python code, but in this library there is no way to represent comments. So adding descriptions in form of comments is quite difficult, but we still can do it like turms - using docstrings or description= attribute.

[chestm007]

#413

Seems to address this, at least somewhat partially

setting

introspection_descriptions=true

and running ariadne-codegen loads up my generated client with docstrings where id expect them.

It doesn't address the include_comments setting being unclear, that doesn't really make a lot of sense to me to exist.