[3.13] pythongh-126543: Docs: change "bound type var" to "bounded" when used in the context of the 'bound' kw argument to TypeVar (pythonGH-126584) (python#126657)

(cherry picked from commit 434b297)

Co-authored-by: Pedro Fonini <[email protected]>

Author: miss-islington

Doc/library/typing.rst

@@ -1726,11 +1726,11 @@ without the dedicated syntax, as documented below.
       class Sequence[T]:  # T is a TypeVar
           ...
 
-   This syntax can also be used to create bound and constrained type
+   This syntax can also be used to create bounded and constrained type
    variables::
 
-      class StrSequence[S: str]:  # S is a TypeVar bound to str
-          ...
+      class StrSequence[S: str]:  # S is a TypeVar with a `str` upper bound;
+          ...                     # we can say that S is "bounded by `str`"
 
 
       class StrOrBytesSequence[A: (str, bytes)]:  # A is a TypeVar constrained to str or bytes
@@ -1763,8 +1763,8 @@ without the dedicated syntax, as documented below.
           """Add two strings or bytes objects together."""
           return x + y
 
-   Note that type variables can be *bound*, *constrained*, or neither, but
-   cannot be both bound *and* constrained.
+   Note that type variables can be *bounded*, *constrained*, or neither, but
+   cannot be both bounded *and* constrained.
 
    The variance of type variables is inferred by type checkers when they are created
    through the :ref:`type parameter syntax <type-params>` or when
@@ -1774,8 +1774,8 @@ without the dedicated syntax, as documented below.
    By default, manually created type variables are invariant.
    See :pep:`484` and :pep:`695` for more details.
 
-   Bound type variables and constrained type variables have different
-   semantics in several important ways. Using a *bound* type variable means
+   Bounded type variables and constrained type variables have different
+   semantics in several important ways. Using a *bounded* type variable means
    that the ``TypeVar`` will be solved using the most specific type possible::
 
       x = print_capitalized('a string')
@@ -1789,8 +1789,8 @@ without the dedicated syntax, as documented below.
 
       z = print_capitalized(45)  # error: int is not a subtype of str
 
-   Type variables can be bound to concrete types, abstract types (ABCs or
-   protocols), and even unions of types::
+   The upper bound of a type variable can be a concrete type, abstract type
+   (ABC or Protocol), or even a union of types::
 
       # Can be anything with an __abs__ method
       def print_abs[T: SupportsAbs](arg: T) -> None:
@@ -1834,7 +1834,7 @@ without the dedicated syntax, as documented below.
 
    .. attribute:: __bound__
 
-      The bound of the type variable, if any.
+      The upper bound of the type variable, if any.
 
       .. versionchanged:: 3.12
 
@@ -2060,7 +2060,7 @@ without the dedicated syntax, as documented below.
           return x + y
 
    Without ``ParamSpec``, the simplest way to annotate this previously was to
-   use a :class:`TypeVar` with bound ``Callable[..., Any]``.  However this
+   use a :class:`TypeVar` with upper bound ``Callable[..., Any]``.  However this
    causes two problems:
 
    1. The type checker can't type check the ``inner`` function because