Skip to content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Hi @ligoudaner377

By definition we have sin_theta_t = et_ti * sin_theta_i
The current code translates to:

-(-sqr(cos_theta_i) + 1) * sqr(eta_ti) + 1 =  # which we'll rewrite as
1 - (1 - sqr(cos_theta_i)) * sqr(eta_ti) =    # using trigonometric identities we get
1 - sqr(sin_theta_i) * sqr(eta_ti) =          # if we take the square of our definition and subsitute it in this formula we get
1 - sqr(sin_theta_t) =                        # again with the trigonometric identity:
sqr(cos_theta_t)

Do you agree?

Replies: 1 comment 1 reply

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@ligoudaner377
Comment options

Answer selected by ligoudaner377
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants