-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
Open
Description
Blog Post Submission
Post Type
- Deep Dive
- How-To
- Use Case
- Tips / Best Practices
- Features
Topics
- GenAI
- Advanced
- Deployment
- Core
Title
Deep Agent Evaluation in MLflow with TruLens Scorers
Abstract
Snowflake recently published a companion piece covering the TruLens side of this integration: Scaling Agent Reliability: Trace-Aware Evaluation for MLflow. This post would cover it from MLflow's perspective.
The TruLens integration (PR #19492, MLflow 3.9.0) adds trace-aware evaluation to MLflow's scorer ecosystem. Building on the scorer pattern designed by @smoorjani (DeepEval/RAGAS), this extends it to support agent trace evaluation:
- The agent evaluation problem -- why tool-using agents need trace-level scoring, not just input/output evaluation
- TruLens scorers in MLflow -- Groundedness, ContextRelevance, and the Agent GPA framework (Goal-Plan-Action alignment)
- Trace-aware architecture -- how scorers extract context from MLflow traces (spans, tool calls, retrieval steps)
- MLflow's evaluation ecosystem -- how TruLens fits alongside Phoenix and Guardrails as part of the third-party scorer framework
Target Length
~2000 words
Related Artifacts
- PR: #19492 (+1,694 lines, merged)
- Release: MLflow 3.9.0
- Snowflake companion blog: https://www.snowflake.com/en/engineering-blog/trace-aware-agent-evaluation-mlflow/
- Original scorer pattern: DeepEval/RAGAS by @smoorjani
Provenance
- Original scorer pattern: @smoorjani
- TruLens integration: Debu Sinha (@debu-sinha)
- Code review: @smoorjani, @AveshCSingh
- TruLens collaboration: @sfc-gh-jreini (co-authored the Snowflake blog)
Additional Context
The Snowflake blog covers the TruLens/Agent GPA perspective. A companion piece from MLflow's side would be natural co-promotion content -- different angle, complementary framing.
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels