Skip to content

Audit required / init / abstract / sealed / etc. in protocol types #519

@stephentoub

Description

@stephentoub

Our structure of these types is inconsistent. Some properties are set, others are init. Some base classes are abstract, others aren't. Some types are sealed, others aren't. There doesn't appear to be a rhyme or reason to most of it.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions