Skip to content

Commit 8809e9d

Browse files
committed
Add draft Inspector Roadmap
1 parent cf44b30 commit 8809e9d

File tree

1 file changed

+39
-0
lines changed

1 file changed

+39
-0
lines changed

roadmap.md

Lines changed: 39 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
1+
# MCP Inspector Roadmap
2+
3+
Timeline is TBD - this preliminary draft is to collect categories of improvements and discuss them with the maintainers group.
4+
5+
Next steps after deciding on what is highest priority would be to set up a simple Project in the repo and reference the exact issues there.
6+
7+
## CLI Mode
8+
9+
We have a few PRs and issues open around these:
10+
11+
- Add configuration parity with UI mode
12+
- Add feature parity with UI mode
13+
14+
We've also discussed separating this out into a dedicated repo, if that would help with maintainability.
15+
16+
## UX Improvements (UI Mode)
17+
18+
- Revisit UI design?
19+
- Add ability to edit/add arbitrary headers
20+
- TODO: Call out any other specific enhancements/bugs that we think are significant
21+
22+
## Automation/General Process Improvements
23+
24+
- Automatic dependency updates with Dependabot (SDK, etc.)
25+
- Automation with Claude Code Github Action:
26+
- Initial pass at PR review
27+
- Initial pass at issue triage/labeling
28+
- Opening PRs for simple bugs
29+
- Needs references to MCP spec/docs and example tools for testing
30+
- Revisit how we want to label issues and PRs
31+
- Playwright tests vs ad-hoc testing - what makes sense to expand here as part of CI vs doing on-demand?
32+
33+
## LLM Integration
34+
35+
We previously decided not to include this, but people are finding it useful in alternative testing apps. Our previous concerns were around maintainability and whether this really belongs in Inspector.
36+
37+
Examples:
38+
- Chat functionality to test MCP features
39+
- Real sampling with an LLM

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)