Commit e992562
authored
fix(spec): registryType, identifier, version should be required fields (#548)
<!-- Provide a brief summary of your changes -->
## Motivation and Context
<!-- Why is this change needed? What problem does it solve? -->
This seems to be a regresion after rename, those fields were originally
required:
https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/registry/blob/8d7e471fd3f28fbaccb69f69e8b39483ac4c58c3/docs/server-registry-api/openapi.yaml#L247-L252
In
https://static.modelcontextprotocol.io/schemas/2025-09-16/server.schema.json,
those fields are also required.
## How Has This Been Tested?
<!-- Have you tested this in a real application? Which scenarios were
tested? -->
## Breaking Changes
<!-- Will users need to update their code or configurations? -->
No
## Types of changes
<!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all
the boxes that apply: -->
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to change)
- [x] Documentation update
## Checklist
<!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [ ] I have read the [MCP
Documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io)
- [ ] My code follows the repository's style guidelines
- [ ] New and existing tests pass locally
- [ ] I have added appropriate error handling
- [ ] I have added or updated documentation as needed
## Additional context
<!-- Add any other context, implementation notes, or design decisions
-->1 parent b21c6f5 commit e992562
1 file changed
+4
-0
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
319 | 319 | | |
320 | 320 | | |
321 | 321 | | |
| 322 | + | |
| 323 | + | |
| 324 | + | |
| 325 | + | |
322 | 326 | | |
323 | 327 | | |
324 | 328 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments