Feature Request: Support for the SWR Package in FloPy #2567
Unanswered
eacuellarq
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment
-
There is a |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Currently, FloPy provides extensive support for many MODFLOW packages, but it seems the Surface-Water Routing (SWR) package from MODFLOW-NWT is not included. The SWR package is crucial for modeling surface-water and groundwater interactions, and having it integrated into FloPy would be highly beneficial for many users.
I would like to request the following:
Official Support for SWR: If feasible, adding SWR to FloPy would significantly enhance its capabilities.
Guidance for Custom Implementation: If official support is not planned, could you provide documentation or guidelines for extending FloPy to include unsupported packages like SWR?
Potential Benefits:
Expands FloPy’s functionality for coupled surface-water/groundwater modeling.
Allows for streamlined workflows when using MODFLOW-NWT with SWR.
Willing to Contribute:
I am happy to assist by testing or providing feedback if SWR support is developed.
Additional Context:
If there are known workarounds or plans for this in the future, any information would be greatly appreciated.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions