Is it possible to have the compiler generate the swig interface for you like gm2?

[ghost]

gm2 could generate a swig interface (*.i) for you when you compile a module. You then could use swig to generate bindings to other languages (Python, Perl,...). I know about the existent of swig cm3 but it seems to be the reverse. It generates Modula 3 bindings from C/C++ libraries. I want to be able to use my Modula 3 module from Python instead. Please have a look at:

https://www.nongnu.org/gm2/11/interface_for_python.html

https://www.nongnu.org/gm2/11/producing_a_python_module.html

[mikanystrom]

If you don't mind coding in scheme! Garbage collection works! And objects! https://github.com/modula3/cm3/tree/master/m3-scheme There may be some bit rot here. If you're really interested, I can probably find the time to clean it up a bit. Mika

…

On Wed, Sep 7, 2022, 3:13 AM pwd96m4a ***@***.***> wrote: gm2 could generate a swig interface (*.i) for you when you compile a module. You then could use swig to generate bindings to other languages (Python, Perl,...). I know about the existent of swig cm3 but it seems to be the reverse. It generates Modula 3 bindings from C/C++ libraries. I want to be able to use my Modula 3 module from Python instead. Please have a look at: https://www.nongnu.org/gm2/11/interface_for_python.html https://www.nongnu.org/gm2/11/producing_a_python_module.html — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1060>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABKYNJITRXMTHCA26L2B5G3V47T5DANCNFSM6AAAAAAQGJ7SSE> . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>