Skip to content

Conversation

goodmind
Copy link

@goodmind goodmind commented Feb 6, 2019

Should this be like this?

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Feb 6, 2019

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 544

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 88.385%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 539: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 824
Relevant Lines: 911

💛 - Coveralls

Comment on lines +239 to 241
with<T>(rawSourceMap: RawSourceMap, sourceMapUrl: SourceMapUrl | null | undefined, callback: (consumer: BasicSourceMapConsumer) => Promise<T> | T): Promise<T>;
with<T>(rawSourceMap: RawIndexMap, sourceMapUrl: SourceMapUrl | null | undefined, callback: (consumer: IndexedSourceMapConsumer) => Promise<T> | T): Promise<T>;
with<T>(rawSourceMap: RawSourceMap | RawIndexMap | string, sourceMapUrl: SourceMapUrl | null | undefined, callback: (consumer: BasicSourceMapConsumer | IndexedSourceMapConsumer) => Promise<T> | T): Promise<T>;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is confusing. I might see an improvement if you were removing the 3rd line 241.
So that we either type rawSourceMap as RawSourceMap or as RawIndex, but as-is the last line still allow mixed types.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants