Runtime error

[RajaniPKurup]

Great project and simple, elaborate explanation with code. But the plots dont come up right for me and RButilization_avg_vector etc give only single values. What might be wrong?

[mariclucas]

Thanks for your comment. I will try to explain what I think it could be happening.

If you are running the function RadioLatencyAnalysis as it is currently in the repository, you are probably only analyzing/plotting a single value of SCS because SCS is set to only one value (SCS = 30). However, to be sure about that, I would need to know the input
parameters you are providing to RadioLatencyAnalysis.

In any case, and to prevent these errors, I have made some minor changes to the RadioLatencyAnalysis and analysis functions. Additionally, I tried to clarify the steps required to configure these files before running the analysis.

When the RadioLatencyAnalysis function is run, a series of warnings are displayed on the screen for the user to review the configuration of the configurable parameters. It is also important to note that certain lines of code within the analysis function
must be adapted if you want to plot the data as a function of a different variable. This is indicated directly in the code of the analysis function.

Please, try to run the code as it is currently in the repository. To this aim, run the following code:

lanzar_RadioLatency_highway_periodic_repetitions;
RadioLatencyAnalysis('avgLatency','density','figure');

I hope everything works fine. After running the previous code, you should obtain the following figures:

avgLatency_density_highway1732_3lanesxdir_periodic_DL_BW20_v2_pkt300_SCS15_table2_Tp20_MCTx1_maxReTx0_krep1.fig
avgLatency_density_highway1732_3lanesxdir_periodic_DL_BW20_v2_pkt300_SCS15_table2_Tp100_MCTx1_maxReTx0_krep1.fig
avgLatency_density_highway1732_3lanesxdir_periodic_DL_BW20_v2_pkt300_SCS15_table3_Tp20_MCTx1_maxReTx0_krep1.fig
avgLatency_density_highway1732_3lanesxdir_periodic_DL_BW20_v2_pkt300_SCS15_table3_Tp100_MCTx1_maxReTx0_krep1.fig

Each of these figures show the average experienced latency as a function of the density for the different SCSs evaluated.

Now, try to change the way results are represented. We will create a a figure for each SCS value analyzed. Within each figure, the latency will be represented as a function of the Tp, and each figure will include a different plot for each density value evaluated. Please, do the following changes in analysis.m:

line 31: auxNewValueForAnalysis=SCS;
line 43: SCS=auxNewValueForAnalysis(ifig);
line 44: varcol1='SCS';

line 186: auxNewPlot=density;
line 187: varcol2='density';
line 204: density = auxNewPlot(iter);

and run:

RadioLatencyAnalysis('avgLatency','Tp','figure');

The following figures should be generated:

avgLatency_Tp_highway1732_3lanesxdir_periodic_DL_BW20_v2_pkt300_SCS15_density10_table2_MCTx1_maxReTx0_krep1.fig
avgLatency_Tp_highway1732_3lanesxdir_periodic_DL_BW20_v2_pkt300_SCS15_density10_table3_MCTx1_maxReTx0_krep1.fig
avgLatency_Tp_highway1732_3lanesxdir_periodic_DL_BW20_v2_pkt300_SCS30_density10_table2_MCTx1_maxReTx0_krep1.fig
avgLatency_Tp_highway1732_3lanesxdir_periodic_DL_BW20_v2_pkt300_SCS30_density10_table3_MCTx1_maxReTx0_krep1.fig
avgLatency_Tp_highway1732_3lanesxdir_periodic_DL_BW20_v2_pkt300_SCS59_density10_table2_MCTx1_maxReTx0_krep1.fig
avgLatency_Tp_highway1732_3lanesxdir_periodic_DL_BW20_v2_pkt300_SCS59_density10_table3_MCTx1_maxReTx0_krep1.fig

Please, let me know if with this explanation you can solve your issue and everything is clear now.

Regards, Mª Carmen

[RajaniPKurup]

Thank you very much for sharing the information.... am working on it

…

On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 2:40 PM mariclucas ***@***.***> wrote: *mariclucas* left a comment (msepulcre/5G-NR-Radio-Latency-Models#1) <#1 (comment)> Thanks for your comment. I will try to explain what I think it could be happening. If you are running the function RadioLatencyAnalysis as it is currently in the repository, you are probably only analyzing/plotting a single value of SCS because SCS is set to only one value (SCS = 30). However, to be sure about that, I would need to know the input parameters you are providing to RadioLatencyAnalysis. In any case, and to prevent these errors, I have made some minor changes to the RadioLatencyAnalysis and analysis functions. Additionally, I tried to clarify the steps required to configure these files before running the analysis. When the RadioLatencyAnalysis function is run, a series of warnings are displayed on the screen for the user to review the configuration of the configurable parameters. It is also important to note that certain lines of code within the analysis function must be adapted if you want to plot the data as a function of a different variable. This is indicated directly in the code of the analysis function. Please, try to run the code as it is currently in the repository. To this aim, run the following code: lanzar_RadioLatency_highway_periodic_repetitions; RadioLatencyAnalysis('avgLatency','density','figure'); I hope everything works fine. After running the previous code, you should obtain the following figures: avgLatency_density_highway1732_3lanesxdir_periodic_DL_BW20_v2_pkt300_SCS15_table2_Tp20_MCTx1_maxReTx0_krep1.fig avgLatency_density_highway1732_3lanesxdir_periodic_DL_BW20_v2_pkt300_SCS15_table2_Tp100_MCTx1_maxReTx0_krep1.fig avgLatency_density_highway1732_3lanesxdir_periodic_DL_BW20_v2_pkt300_SCS15_table3_Tp20_MCTx1_maxReTx0_krep1.fig avgLatency_density_highway1732_3lanesxdir_periodic_DL_BW20_v2_pkt300_SCS15_table3_Tp100_MCTx1_maxReTx0_krep1.fig Each of these figures show the average experienced latency as a function of the density for the different SCSs evaluated. Now, try to change the way results are represented. We will create a a figure for each SCS value analyzed. Within each figure, the latency will be represented as a function of the Tp, and each figure will include a different plot for each density value evaluated. Please, do the following changes in analysis.m: line 31: auxNewValueForAnalysis=SCS; line 43: SCS=auxNewValueForAnalysis(ifig); line 44: varcol1='SCS'; line 186: auxNewPlot=density; line 187: varcol2='density'; line 204: density = auxNewPlot(iter); and run: RadioLatencyAnalysis('avgLatency','Tp','figure'); The following figures should be generated: avgLatency_Tp_highway1732_3lanesxdir_periodic_DL_BW20_v2_pkt300_SCS15_density10_table2_MCTx1_maxReTx0_krep1.fig avgLatency_Tp_highway1732_3lanesxdir_periodic_DL_BW20_v2_pkt300_SCS15_density10_table3_MCTx1_maxReTx0_krep1.fig avgLatency_Tp_highway1732_3lanesxdir_periodic_DL_BW20_v2_pkt300_SCS30_density10_table2_MCTx1_maxReTx0_krep1.fig avgLatency_Tp_highway1732_3lanesxdir_periodic_DL_BW20_v2_pkt300_SCS30_density10_table3_MCTx1_maxReTx0_krep1.fig avgLatency_Tp_highway1732_3lanesxdir_periodic_DL_BW20_v2_pkt300_SCS59_density10_table2_MCTx1_maxReTx0_krep1.fig avgLatency_Tp_highway1732_3lanesxdir_periodic_DL_BW20_v2_pkt300_SCS59_density10_table3_MCTx1_maxReTx0_krep1.fig Please, let me know if with this explanation you can solve your issue and everything is clear now. Regards, Mª Carmen — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BI7WJUAOQX4L76BMQ7DDJCT3I5SABAVCNFSM6AAAAAB7XFYLVCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTAOBTGI3TKNRQG4> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>