blk-iocost: do not WARN if iocg was already offlined

In iocg_pay_debt(), warn is triggered if 'active_list' is empty, which
is intended to confirm iocg is active when it has debt. However, warn
can be triggered during a blkcg or disk removal, if iocg_waitq_timer_fn()
is run at that time:

  WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2344971 at block/blk-iocost.c:1402 iocg_pay_debt+0x14c/0x190
  Call trace:
  iocg_pay_debt+0x14c/0x190
  iocg_kick_waitq+0x438/0x4c0
  iocg_waitq_timer_fn+0xd8/0x130
  __run_hrtimer+0x144/0x45c
  __hrtimer_run_queues+0x16c/0x244
  hrtimer_interrupt+0x2cc/0x7b0

The warn in this situation is meaningless. Since this iocg is being
removed, the state of the 'active_list' is irrelevant, and 'waitq_timer'
is canceled after removing 'active_list' in ioc_pd_free(), which ensures
iocg is freed after iocg_waitq_timer_fn() returns.

Therefore, add the check if iocg was already offlined to avoid warn
when removing a blkcg or disk.

Signed-off-by: Li Nan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Yu Kuai <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>

Author: Li Nan

block/blk-iocost.c

@@ -1439,8 +1439,11 @@ static void iocg_pay_debt(struct ioc_gq *iocg, u64 abs_vpay,
 	lockdep_assert_held(&iocg->ioc->lock);
 	lockdep_assert_held(&iocg->waitq.lock);
 
-	/* make sure that nobody messed with @iocg */
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(list_empty(&iocg->active_list));
+	/*
+	 * make sure that nobody messed with @iocg. Check iocg->pd.online
+	 * to avoid warn when removing blkcg or disk.
+	 */
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(list_empty(&iocg->active_list) && iocg->pd.online);
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(iocg->inuse > 1);
 
 	iocg->abs_vdebt -= min(abs_vpay, iocg->abs_vdebt);