Update 1 NuGet dependencies

[nfbot]

Bumps nanoFramework.TestFramework from 3.0.60 to 3.0.67

[version update]

⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Upgraded an internal testing framework to a newer version, ensuring improved consistency and stability.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

This update modifies the dependency version of nanoFramework.TestFramework in the Tests/SerializationTests/packages.lock.json file. The version has been updated from 3.0.60 to 3.0.67, and the corresponding content hash has been revised to match the new version. The dependency for nanoFramework.CoreLibrary remains unchanged.

Changes

File(s)	Change Summary
Tests/SerializationTests/packages.lock.json	Updated nanoFramework.TestFramework from 3.0.60 to 3.0.67; revised content hash; no change to nanoFramework.CoreLibrary

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7b70ca4 and cf537a8.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)

• Tests/SerializationTests/SerializationTests.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
• Tests/SerializationTests/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• Tests/SerializationTests/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

Tests/SerializationTests/packages.lock.json (1)

13-15: LGTM! Automated dependency update looks correct.

The version update for nanoFramework.TestFramework from 3.0.60 to 3.0.67 is consistent with the PR objectives. The content hash has been updated accordingly.

Let's verify this version exists and check for any breaking changes:

✅ Verification successful

🌐 Web query:

What are the changes between nanoFramework.TestFramework versions 3.0.60 and 3.0.67?

💡 Result:

Based on the provided search results, there is no explicit information detailing changes between nanoFramework.TestFramework versions 3.0.60 and 3.0.67. The latest version mentioned in the sources is 3.0.57 (released January 30, 2025)[1], with older versions like 2.x and 1.x documented[1][7].

Key Observations:

1. Version 3.x Releases:
   The most recent version explicitly listed is 3.0.57, with no details about 3.0.60 or 3.0.67 in any search result[1][6][7].

2. Version Patterns:

   • Version 3.x updates typically include dependency bumps (e.g., nanoFramework.CoreLibrary)[6].
   • Updates often address compatibility with Visual Studio extensions or test framework optimizations[6][8].

Recommendations:

To find changes between 3.0.60 and 3.0.67, check:

• The GitHub repository for release notes or commit history[7].
• NuGet package metadata for dependency updates or changelogs[1].

Without additional data from these sources, specific changes cannot be confirmed from the provided search results[1][6][7].

Citations:

• 1: https://www.nuget.org/packages/nanoFramework.TestFramework/
• 2: https://docs.nanoframework.net/content/unit-test/index.html
• 3: https://docs.nanoframework.net/content/architecture/unit-test.html
• 4: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/framework/whats-new/?redirectedfrom=MSDN
• 5: https://devblogs.microsoft.com/dotnet/show-dotnet-build-your-own-unit-test-platform-the-true-story-of-net-nanoframework/
• 6: https://github.com/nanoframework/nf-Visual-Studio-extension/releases
• 7: https://github.com/nanoframework/nanoFramework.TestFramework
• 8: https://docs.nanoframework.net/content/unit-test/running-tests.html
• 9: https://github.com/nanoframework/CoreLibrary
• 10: https://nanoframework.net/real-hardware-tests-in-azure-devops-pipelines-for-net-nanoframework-pr-iot-teststream/

---

Dependency Update Verification: nanoFramework.TestFramework 3.0.67

• The package lock file update reflects the automated change with the version bump and updated content hash.
• A web search for explicit differences between versions 3.0.60 and 3.0.67 returned no detailed changelog; this is common when updates are minor or rely on internal tracking.
• There’s no evidence of breaking changes based on the available information.

Overall, the automated update appears correct.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud