Update 1 NuGet dependencies

[nfbot]

Bumps nanoFramework.System.IO.FileSystem from 1.1.66 to 1.1.69

[version update]

⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated dependency nanoFramework.System.IO.FileSystem from version 1.1.66 to 1.1.69 in project lock files
  • Refreshed content hash for the updated dependency

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

This pull request involves updating the nanoFramework.System.IO.FileSystem dependency to version 1.1.69 in two separate packages.lock.json files: one in the nanoFramework.WebServer.FileSystem project and another in the WebServerE2ETests directory. The update includes modifying the requested and resolved versions, as well as updating the content hash associated with the dependency.

Changes

File	Change Summary
nanoFramework.WebServer.FileSystem/packages.lock.json	Updated nanoFramework.System.IO.FileSystem dependency from version 1.1.66 to 1.1.69
tests/WebServerE2ETests/packages.lock.json	Updated nanoFramework.System.IO.FileSystem dependency from version 1.1.66 to 1.1.69

Possibly related PRs

• Update 5 NuGet dependencies #287: Updates the same nanoFramework.System.IO.FileSystem dependency from version 1.1.66 to 1.1.69, directly related to the changes in this PR.

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 538ed09 and 2a2c2a9.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (5)

• nanoFramework.WebServer.FileSystem.nuspec is excluded by none and included by none
• nanoFramework.WebServer.FileSystem/nanoFramework.WebServer.FileSystem.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
• nanoFramework.WebServer.FileSystem/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
• tests/WebServerE2ETests/WebServerE2ETests.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
• tests/WebServerE2ETests/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• nanoFramework.WebServer.FileSystem/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)
• tests/WebServerE2ETests/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (2)

nanoFramework.WebServer.FileSystem/packages.lock.json (1)

25-27: Verify compatibility with version 1.1.69

The dependency update looks consistent. Let's verify there are no breaking changes in this version update.

Run the following script to check the changelog and release notes:

✅ Verification successful

Version update appears safe

The change from 1.1.66 to 1.1.69 is a patch version increment only, indicating backward-compatible bug fixes according to semantic versioning principles.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for breaking changes in the version update

# Get the release notes and changelog
gh api repos/nanoframework/System.IO.FileSystem/releases/tags/v1.1.69 --jq .body

Length of output: 83

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Try multiple approaches to gather version information

# Check for CHANGELOG.md or similar files
echo "=== Searching for changelog files ==="
fd -i changelog

# Look for version-related commits
echo -e "\n=== Checking recent commits mentioning version 1.1.69 ==="
git log --oneline --grep="1.1.69"

# Search for version information in documentation
echo -e "\n=== Searching for version mentions in docs ==="
rg -i "1\.1\.69" --type-add 'docs:*.{md,txt}' -tdocs

# Check package metadata files
echo -e "\n=== Checking package metadata files ==="
fd -e nuspec -e props -e csproj | xargs cat

Length of output: 4332

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check changelog contents for version information
echo "=== Checking CHANGELOG.md contents ==="
cat CHANGELOG.md

# Also check the dependency's changelog if it exists in the lock file
echo -e "\n=== Checking dependency information ==="
cat nanoFramework.WebServer.FileSystem/packages.lock.json

Length of output: 65785

tests/WebServerE2ETests/packages.lock.json (1)

31-33: LGTM! Version consistency maintained

The dependency version update is consistent with the main project file, maintaining version alignment between the main project and tests.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud