You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Question 1: When using nanomsg to send and receive signals, under high concurrency conditions, the signals sent by the C++ sender do not trigger the slot function of the signal-slot mechanism on the receiver side; however, under the same low concurrency conditions, the signals sent by the C++ sender can successfully trigger the slot function of the signal-slot mechanism on the receiver side.
Question 2: Can replacing nanomsg with nng solve this problem? If yes, what are the main code modifications required, and what is the workload?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Question 1: When using nanomsg to send and receive signals, under high concurrency conditions, the signals sent by the C++ sender do not trigger the slot function of the signal-slot mechanism on the receiver side; however, under the same low concurrency conditions, the signals sent by the C++ sender can successfully trigger the slot function of the signal-slot mechanism on the receiver side.
Question 2: Can replacing nanomsg with nng solve this problem? If yes, what are the main code modifications required, and what is the workload?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions