Skip to content

Conversation

@gem-neo4j
Copy link
Contributor

@gem-neo4j gem-neo4j commented Dec 20, 2024

Added ALL keyword for GQL compliance for RETURN, and for consistency to WITH

@gem-neo4j gem-neo4j force-pushed the cypher25_add_all_keyword_to_return branch from 80d4f1c to 01c478c Compare April 7, 2025 06:28
@gem-neo4j gem-neo4j marked this pull request as ready for review April 7, 2025 06:29
@neo-technology-commit-status-publisher
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR includes documentation updates
View the updated docs at https://neo4j-docs-cypher-1139.surge.sh

Updated pages:

Copy link
Contributor

@hvub hvub left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

Comment on lines +264 to +268
[[with-all-results]]
== WITH ALL

Projecting all results can also be accomplished by explicitly including `ALL` in the `WITH`.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It isn't introduced for GQL compliance, WITH doesn't exist in GQL, it was introduced for consistency

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah yes, sorry!

Comment on lines +264 to +268
[[with-all-results]]
== WITH ALL

Projecting all results can also be accomplished by explicitly including `ALL` in the `WITH`.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It isn't introduced for GQL compliance, WITH doesn't exist in GQL, it was introduced for consistency

@neo4j-docops-agent
Copy link
Collaborator

neo4j-docops-agent commented Apr 11, 2025

Thanks for the documentation updates.

The preview documentation has now been torn down - reopening this PR will republish it.

@JPryce-Aklundh JPryce-Aklundh merged commit 6b780b6 into neo4j:cypher-25 Apr 11, 2025
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants