Skip to content

Commit 1b1b7e7

Browse files
Frannie-LudmillaNataliaIvakina
authored andcommitted
Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: NataliaIvakina <[email protected]>
1 parent bf6008d commit 1b1b7e7

File tree

1 file changed

+7
-9
lines changed

1 file changed

+7
-9
lines changed

modules/ROOT/pages/procedures.adoc

Lines changed: 7 additions & 9 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1078,12 +1078,11 @@ For more information, see the link:{neo4j-docs-base-uri}/cypher-manual/{page-ver
10781078

10791079
[NOTE]
10801080
====
1081-
Users should prefer the usage of procedures.adoc#procedure_dbms_unquarantineDatabase[`dbms.unquarantineDatabase()`]
1082-
over `dbms.quarantineDatabase()` because of the improvements and the new features (see the `operation` option ).
1083-
The deprecated `dbms.quarantineDatabase()` procedure is available in Cypher 5 but not in Cypher 25.
1081+
It is recommended to use <<procedure_dbms_unquarantineDatabase,`dbms.unquarantineDatabase()`>> over `dbms.quarantineDatabase()` due to its improvements and new features (see the `operation` option ).
1082+
The deprecated `dbms.quarantineDatabase()` procedure is available in Cypher 5, but not in Cypher 25.
10841083
====
10851084

1086-
[role=label--enterprise-edition label--admin-only]
1085+
[role=label--enterprise-edition label--admin-only label--new-2025.01]
10871086
[[procedure_dbms_unquarantineDatabase]]
10881087
=== dbms.unquarantineDatabase()
10891088

@@ -1107,11 +1106,10 @@ The possible values for the cleanup operation are:
11071106
[NOTE]
11081107
====
11091108
If you choose to clear the current cluster state, the server will try to join as a new member,
1110-
but this joining can succeed if and only if there is a majority of old members "letting" the
1111-
new members in. Let's assume our cluster has a topology with three primaries. If there is only one server
1112-
in `QUARANTINED` mode, then it is safe to choose `replaceStateKeepStore` or `replaceStateReplaceStore`.
1113-
If there are two servers in `QUARANTINED` mode, then you should not use concurrently `replaceStateKeepStore` or
1114-
`replaceStateReplaceStore` for both servers because there would be no majority to let them in.
1109+
but this joining can succeed if and only if there is a majority of old members "letting" the new members in.
1110+
Let's assume our cluster has a topology with three primaries.
1111+
If there is only one server in `QUARANTINED` mode, then it is safe to choose `replaceStateKeepStore` or `replaceStateReplaceStore`.
1112+
If there are two servers in `QUARANTINED` mode, then you should not use concurrently `replaceStateKeepStore` or `replaceStateReplaceStore` for both servers because there would be no majority to let them in.
11151113
====
11161114

11171115
[role=label--admin-only label--deprecated-5.9]

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)