Skip to content

Conversation

@nick-giles-neo
Copy link
Contributor

@nick-giles-neo nick-giles-neo commented Nov 22, 2024

Also complete the change from 'DBMS panic' to 'server panic', which is a more accurate term.
Related to https://github.com/neo-technology/neo4j/pull/28210

Also complete the change from 'DBMS panic' to 'server panic', which is a more accurate term.
@neo-technology-commit-status-publisher
Copy link
Collaborator

neo-technology-commit-status-publisher commented Dec 16, 2024

Thanks for the documentation updates.

The preview documentation has now been torn down - reopening this PR will republish it.

Copy link
Collaborator

@NataliaIvakina NataliaIvakina left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I synced it up with the description in the code.
@nick-giles-neo, I think we can merge this PR. Test's failures will be covered in another PR

@nick-giles-neo
Copy link
Contributor Author

I synced it up with the description in the code. @nick-giles-neo, I think we can merge this PR. Test's failures will be covered in another PR

Sounds good.

@NataliaIvakina NataliaIvakina merged commit 502560f into dev Dec 17, 2024
7 of 8 checks passed
@NataliaIvakina NataliaIvakina deleted the panic-change branch December 17, 2024 11:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants