Replies: 4 comments 7 replies
|
It is totally possible to do what you showed on that picture. Looks like PatchPanel2 has not a corresponding front port for that rear port. |
6 replies
|
I think in this case you should have a 1:1 relationship with front-port to rear-port, so each strand/pair of the 12-count cable terminates in a distinct rear-port that matches a single front-port. I think the different positions are for MUXes where multiple strands of front-port fiber end up on a single strand of rear-port fiber, not for when multiple strands are bundled into a single cable. Or am I grossly misinterpreting what you are doing here?
—
Mark Tinberg ***@***.***>
Division of Information Technology-Network Services
University of Wisconsin-Madison
…________________________________
From: FisoF ***@***.***>
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2022 12:14 PM
To: netbox-community/netbox ***@***.***>
Cc: Subscribed ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [netbox-community/netbox] Track connection across multiple patchpanels (Discussion #10661)
Thank for your reply. On PatchPanel2 I have 1 rear port with 12 positions (fiber optic cable terminated with splices) Its wrong way ? I must create connection between rear ports of patch panels "line by line", not one cable with multiple positions?
[patchpanel2]<https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/94540299/197583817-3f084c38-e4a4-4f47-8003-6ff6820fd316.png>
[patchpanel2FP]<https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/94540299/197585320-84be49a7-11f2-4648-a552-248cc06354ab.png>
[patchpanel2FPdetail]<https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/94540299/197585347-65efea6a-e38d-44c9-9a28-23203da8b1bb.jpg>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#10661 (reply in thread)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAS7UM46CXBKZC7ONCY4ACTWE27VTANCNFSM6AAAAAARGVSY6Q>.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
1 reply
|
@mtinberg maybe you are right and I misunderstand cabling modeling(and different positions is realy only for MUXes/splitters https://www.peak-fiber.com/product/plc-splitter/ ) . Detailed description in documentation is missing... Or is it bug as @joaolucasmacedo says... |
0 replies
|
I'm reading through the doc and checking in the lab, I think the Positions number is used for MPO cables (and maybe also MUX) where multiple fiber strands are included in the same physical connector/port
https://demo.netbox.dev/static/docs/models/dcim/rearport/
eg https://edgeoptic.com/kb_article/mtp-mpo-cables-all-basics-you-need-to-know/
where you aren't terminating each strand individually in the fiber patch, I suppose LC works that way too.
—
Mark Tinberg ***@***.***>
Division of Information Technology-Network Services
University of Wisconsin-Madison
…________________________________
From: FisoF ***@***.***>
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2022 1:42 PM
To: netbox-community/netbox ***@***.***>
Cc: Mark Tinberg ***@***.***>; Mention ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [netbox-community/netbox] Track connection across multiple patchpanels (Discussion #10661)
@mtinberg<https://github.com/mtinberg> maybe you are right and I misunderstand cabling modeling(and different positions is realy only for MUXes/splitters https://www.peak-fiber.com/product/plc-splitter/ ) . Detailed description in documentation is missing... Or is it bug as @joaolucasmacedo<https://github.com/joaolucasmacedo> says...
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#10661 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAS7UMYHTA5NGEVPV3UMYQTWFAS2FANCNFSM6AAAAAARGVSY6Q>.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment


Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hello ,
Its possible to fully track connectin across multiple patch panels ?
Scheme:
Now result in netbox is:
Thaks for answer
All reactions