Network socket #10986
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
I would represent these wall sockets as separate Devices, each with one Front Port and one Rear Port. Then the far-end room has another such device, and the Rear Ports are connected together with a cable. Alternatively, you could represent all the wall sockets in a room as a single 'Device', and just create multiple front ports and rear ports on this device.
What's at the other end of this port? If this is a "Circuit" from a telco provider, then you'd represent it as a "Circuit Termination" linked to a "Circuit". You can then create a cable from this Circuit Termination to the core switch. However, this is one area where Netbox's data model falls down though, in my opinion. A "Circuit Termination" is a logical entity, not a physical port (e.g. it doesn't have a port type). And yet to connect it, you create a Cable to it. This means that one end of the cable is connected to a logical entity with an unspecified type of port, while the other end is connected to a 1000baseT Interface or whatever. Furthermore, in reality, multiple provider "circuits" can be presented on a single physical port and cable. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
My problem is, if I integrate the network socket, that I see then in the traceroute with the cables always only the next Job. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Good morning,
I am just starting to use Netbox and I love it.
But now I come to a difficulty with a customer where I do not know exactly how to display it.
I have in one room a switch, under this switch are, instead of a patch panel two network sockets attached to the wall, once the supply line to the core switch and once to another switch in another room, see picture.
When I now connect the two switches in Netbox, currently all think these are connected directly and not via the network socket.
Thanks.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions