You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I ran into a problem when trying to enter an inter carrier cross-connect between two different provider's circuits - running NetBox 3.4.4. Our data centers have provider cages/racks, and sometimes circuits / connections are made between providers - we provide the cross-connect/cable (and bill for it).
I tried to model this as follows:
Provider A Network <--> Circuit A-111 <-->
Panel-A1 rear-port 1 - Panel-A1, front-port 1 <--->
Panel-B1 front-port 1 Panel-B1 rear-port 1 <-->
Circuit B-222 <---> Provider B Network
That's how "reality" looks like, and yes, I can enter all this in NetBox. However, I cannot trace the cables. I've read through the docs, and it appears that the "gotcha" is that there's not a single interface in the entire mix.
I came across #10635, where the solution was to build bridged interfaces. I'll try to use that as a work-around (essentially replacing front/rear ports with "interface Front-1 / interface Rear-1, bridged"), but I wonder if there isn't a better way to do this.
I did build bridges, now I'm running into the issue described in #9076, where "everything depends on where you start the trace, but you'll never get a full end-to-end trace".
Any ideas would be appreciated.
I'll gladly submit that as a request, but I don't even know if I found a bug, if it's working-as-intended, or if it'd be a feature request.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I ran into a problem when trying to enter an inter carrier cross-connect between two different provider's circuits - running NetBox 3.4.4. Our data centers have provider cages/racks, and sometimes circuits / connections are made between providers - we provide the cross-connect/cable (and bill for it).
I tried to model this as follows:
Provider A Network <--> Circuit A-111 <-->
Panel-A1 rear-port 1 - Panel-A1, front-port 1 <--->
Panel-B1 front-port 1 Panel-B1 rear-port 1 <-->
Circuit B-222 <---> Provider B Network
That's how "reality" looks like, and yes, I can enter all this in NetBox. However, I cannot trace the cables. I've read through the docs, and it appears that the "gotcha" is that there's not a single interface in the entire mix.
I came across #10635, where the solution was to build bridged interfaces. I'll try to use that as a work-around (essentially replacing front/rear ports with "interface Front-1 / interface Rear-1, bridged"), but I wonder if there isn't a better way to do this.
I did build bridges, now I'm running into the issue described in #9076, where "everything depends on where you start the trace, but you'll never get a full end-to-end trace".
Any ideas would be appreciated.
I'll gladly submit that as a request, but I don't even know if I found a bug, if it's working-as-intended, or if it'd be a feature request.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions