-
Hey! I recently ran into some Problems Assigning Interfaces with Virtual Machines in Netbox. Am i missing something here? Or is this intended? Any help would be appreciated, thanks! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
It is as intended: you cannot associate an interface on a VM with an interface on a device. Note that in the Netbox model, a VM is implicitly mobile between all devices in a "cluster". The main use case for interface parents is subinterfaces: e.g. for interface eth0.100, its parent interface is eth0. For your application, I think you would be better assigning the VM interface as "access mode" assigned to a specific VLAN. Then whichever physical port(s) on your VM host(s) that VLAN appears on, are where the traffic will appear. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
It is as intended: you cannot associate an interface on a VM with an interface on a device. Note that in the Netbox model, a VM is implicitly mobile between all devices in a "cluster".
The main use case for interface parents is subinterfaces: e.g. for interface eth0.100, its parent interface is eth0.
For your application, I think you would be better assigning the VM interface as "access mode" assigned to a specific VLAN. Then whichever physical port(s) on your VM host(s) that VLAN appears on, are where the traffic will appear.