Way to do planned cabling that overlaps with existing cabling? #9038
Unanswered
nmiller2600
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment
-
I have been toying around with a "change request" feature. It could work for example something like this:
The "change request" would be basically a step by step or object by object list of changes to do that could be given to level 1 staff. I have no idea how feasible it would be to do something like this: I do not know how NetBox work internally. Because of that I've never thought out this in detail since maybe it's completely not a possibility in which case the time would be a loss... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I'm trying to model out a move of some equipment and provide a cut-sheet to my datacenter team so that they can perform the cabling now, and then we can cut over the the new connections on the night of the change.
In my case, I'm using unique Network Interfaces (different switches, different ports) but the same interfaces on the server end.
Is it possible to make it so that :
cable types of Connected and planned only overlap within themselves, rather than with each other
or:
Planned cabling can overlap with anything, possibly with warning
or:
is there a better way to accomplish what i'm trying to do?
I'd like to have the currently intact cabling as CONNECTED
map out a new 'planned' cable betwen a device and another.
Then at migration time, CONNECTED would transfer to "Decomissioned" and the planned would transition to connected.
I've been using Netbox to enforce my single-port-single-connection which has been absolutely critical to my needs, but having a planned cable swing feels like a valid use case as well.
Any workarounds/thoughts appreciated.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions