Replies: 1 comment
-
The stance likely isn't changing. That said, there is at least 1 plugin for managing DNS in netbox. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I would like to double-check the direction of this project regarding #4197. I have read the contributing guide and the issue intake policy, but please excuse me if this is an inappropriate question.
I am maintaining sukiyaki/octodns-netbox, which allows us to properly manage DNS records across multiple providers based on NetBox data. At first I used the
description
field as a place to store comma-separated FQDNs, but since NetBox now has adns_name
field, I have received several PRs (sukiyaki/octodns-netbox#1, sukiyaki/octodns-netbox#2) to take advantage of this.By the discussion at #4197, I understand that any enhancements for storing multiple FQDNs in the
dns_field
field will not be allowed forever, is this correct?I have found that a wildcard record has been implemented recently. This appears to be a deviation (extension) of the rule of "hold a single name only", at least conceptually. In addition, it appears that this enhancement, despite being passed over at one time #4973, was considered again at the suggestion of the community #8785.
Therefore, I would like to know if there are any possibility of enhancements to the
dns_name
field to decide the direction of my project. Thank you!Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions