Skip to content

Commit 7652bd2

Browse files
committed
docs(kb): add 4 new Netwrix Access Analyzer KB articles for ExchangePS and SPAA/SPAC errors and warnings
1 parent 7376850 commit 7652bd2

5 files changed

+115
-0
lines changed
Lines changed: 36 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
1+
---
2+
title: "Error: Invalid Local SPAA Storage Version. Expected 11603 but Found 0"
3+
sidebar_label: "Error: Invalid Local SPAA Storage Version. Expected 11603 but Found 0"
4+
description: "Resolve the 'Invalid Local SPAA Storage Version' error in Netwrix Access Analyzer by running the required SPAA or SPSEEK System Scans before executing a SPAC System Scan."
5+
keywords: [SPAA, SPAC, SPSEEK, InvalidStorageVersionException, Netwrix, Access Analyzer, system scan, storage version, error 11603]
6+
products: [access-analyzer, enterprise-auditor]
7+
knowledge_article_id: kA0Qk000000XXXXKAA
8+
---
9+
10+
## Related Queries
11+
12+
- "SPAC scan fails with storage version error."
13+
- "Error: InvalidStorageVersionException Expected 11603."
14+
15+
## Symptom
16+
17+
When attempting to run a SPAC System Scan in Netwrix Access Analyzer (formerly Enterprise Auditor), the following error occurs:
18+
19+
```text
20+
Stealthbits.StealthAUDIT.DataCollectors.SPAA.Storage.InvalidStorageVersionException: Invalid local spaa storage version. Expected 11603 but found 0.
21+
```
22+
23+
## Cause
24+
25+
This error occurs when a SPAC System Scan is run *before* a SPAA System Scan or SPSEEK System Scan has been executed.
26+
These scans are required to initialize and version the local SPAA storage.
27+
If neither scan has been completed, the system reports an invalid version of `0`.
28+
29+
## Resolution
30+
31+
To resolve the issue:
32+
33+
1. Run a **SPAA System Scan** or a **SPSEEK System Scan**
34+
2. After the scan completes successfully, run the **SPAC System Scan** again.
35+
36+
---

docs/kb/accessanalyzer/ExchangePS-Error-WinRM-Shell-Client-Cannot-Process-Request

Whitespace-only changes.

docs/kb/accessanalyzer/ExchangePS-error-cannot-find-variable-with-name-enablesearchonlysession

Whitespace-only changes.

docs/kb/accessanalyzer/SEEK-warning-DLPEX-Database-Not-Exist

Whitespace-only changes.
Lines changed: 79 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
1+
---
2+
description: >
3+
When accessing the Scheduled Actions section in Netwrix Access Analyzer, the console may fail to load with the error "Sequence contains more than one matching element." This occurs when duplicate job files exist in the Jobs directory. Learn how to identify and resolve this error.
4+
keywords:
5+
- Netwrix Access Analyzer
6+
- NAA
7+
- Scheduled Actions
8+
- SAJOB error
9+
- duplicate job file
10+
- jobs directory
11+
- task initialization
12+
- failed to get tasks
13+
- console error
14+
- backup job conflict
15+
products:
16+
- access-analyzer
17+
sidebar_label: 'Error: Failed to Initialize Task SAJOB – Sequence Conflict'
18+
title: 'Error: Failed to Initialize Task SAJOB – Sequence Contains More Than One Matching Element'
19+
knowledge_article_id: kA0Qk000000XXXXKAA
20+
---
21+
22+
# Error: Failed to Initialize Task SAJOB – Sequence Contains More Than One Matching Element
23+
24+
## Related Queries
25+
26+
- “Netwrix Access Analyzer Scheduled Actions not loading”
27+
- “Failed to initialize task SAJOB… sequence contains more than one matching element”
28+
- “Duplicate job name causing console error”
29+
- “NAA job loading issue”
30+
31+
## Symptom
32+
33+
When accessing the **Scheduled Actions** section in **Netwrix Access Analyzer (NAA)**, the following error appears:
34+
35+
```text
36+
Failed to get tasks. Error: Failed to initialize task SAJOB~JobName~{GUID}.job.
37+
Error: Sequence contains more than one matching element
38+
```
39+
40+
## Cause
41+
42+
Netwrix Access Analyzer scans the entire `Jobs` directory—including all subfolders—for job files. Each job must be uniquely identified by the system.
43+
44+
This error occurs when **multiple copies of the same job file** exist within the `Jobs` directory tree, often because someone copied job folders into a subfolder such as `Backup` for safekeeping.
45+
46+
Renaming the folder (for example, `BU_Backup`) does **not** resolve the issue. All subfolders under `Jobs` are scanned.
47+
48+
> Copying jobs between valid group folders is supported. For example:
49+
> - `1-FSAA_SystemScan`
50+
> - `1-FSAA_SystemScan1`
51+
>
52+
> These are fine because they are treated as separate jobs.
53+
54+
## Resolution
55+
56+
### Step 1: Search for Duplicate Job Names
57+
58+
1. Open **File Explorer**.
59+
2. Navigate to `%SAInstall%\Jobs`.
60+
3. Use the **Search** bar to search for the job name listed in the error (for example, `AD Users`).
61+
4. Look for the **same job name appearing in more than one folder**, especially in folders such as `Backup`, `Archive`, or other custom subfolders inside `Jobs`.
62+
63+
> If the same job appears in multiple locations with the **exact same name**, that is likely the cause of the conflict.
64+
65+
### Step 2: Remove or Move the Extra Copy
66+
67+
- **Move any backup copies** outside of the `Jobs` directory (for example, to `C:\JobBackups`).
68+
- Or, if no longer needed, **delete the duplicate copy**.
69+
70+
### Step 3: Relaunch the Console
71+
72+
After cleaning up the duplicates:
73+
74+
- Restart **Netwrix Access Analyzer**.
75+
- The **Scheduled Actions** view should now load without errors.
76+
77+
## Best Practice
78+
79+
> **Do not store backup jobs inside the `Jobs` directory.** Always move backups to a folder outside of it (for example, `C:\JobBackups`) to avoid conflicts.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)