Skip to content

Conversation

@jeremymoskowitz-netwrix
Copy link
Contributor

Lots of EPM changes. Reverting a bunch of wrongly named "endpointpolicymanager.com" (which never existed) back to PolicyPak.com. Fixing a bunch of KB --> Technote references

@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Nov 11, 2025

PR Review: Endpoint Policy Manager Documentation Updates

Summary

This PR successfully addresses two major documentation cleanup tasks across 2,027 files:

  1. ✅ Reverting incorrect "endpointpolicymanager.com" references to "policypak.com"
  2. ✅ Converting Knowledge Base (KB) references to Tech Notes where appropriate

Code Quality & Best Practices: ✅ EXCELLENT

Strengths:

  • Comprehensive coverage: Changes are thorough and systematic across the entire documentation
  • Context-aware transformations: Not a blind find-replace; proper preservation of legitimate "KB" references
  • Consistency maintained: All 410 instances of policypak.com follow correct domain patterns
  • No regressions introduced: Microsoft KB references (KB3033929, KB5035845, etc.) correctly preserved

Potential Issues & Recommendations

Minor: 4 Files with Potential Inconsistencies

The following files contain "KB article" references that may need review to determine if they should say "Tech Note":

  1. docs/endpointpolicymanager/gettingstarted/cloudmanual/licensing/reconnectionperiod.md:13 - "see this KB article:"
  2. docs/endpointpolicymanager/gettingstarted/cloudmanual/uninstall.md:17 - "Check the KB article here"
  3. docs/endpointpolicymanager/components/browserrouter/knowledgebase/tipsandtricks/browsermode.md:46 - "see this kb article for more"
  4. docs/endpointpolicymanager/components/applicationsettingsmanager/technotes/troubleshooting/code0xc000428.md:76 - "see the KB below:"

Recommendation: Review these 4 instances to determine if they're internal references (should be "Tech Note") or if "KB article" is the preferred terminology for internal documentation references.

Enhancement Opportunity: Directory Naming Convention

The codebase currently uses both naming conventions:

  • "knowledgebase" directories: 13 instances
  • "technotes" directories: 9 instances

Recommendation: Consider standardizing to one convention for consistency (likely "technotes" based on the PR's intent), or document the distinction if intentional.

Security Concerns: ✅ NONE

  • Domain corrections remove references to non-existent domains
  • All external links point to legitimate policypak.com domains
  • No security issues identified

Performance Considerations: ✅ N/A

  • Documentation-only changes
  • No performance impact

Test Coverage: ✅ APPROPRIATE

Verification performed:

  • ✅ Zero remaining instances of "endpointpolicymanager.com"
  • ✅ All policypak.com references are valid (410 occurrences across 231 files)
  • ✅ Microsoft KB references preserved correctly (6 files)
  • ✅ Directory structure maintains proper organization

Suggested validation:

  • Manual spot-check of the 4 files with "KB article" references
  • Verify all documentation builds successfully
  • Check that navigation and cross-references work correctly

Overall Assessment: ✅ APPROVED

This is a high-quality, thorough documentation cleanup that demonstrates excellent attention to detail. The changes are:

  • Comprehensive (2,027 files)
  • Contextually appropriate
  • Free of regressions
  • Well-executed with minimal follow-up needed

The scale of this PR (4,838 additions / 1,762 deletions) reflects the breadth of necessary corrections rather than code bloat.

Minor action items:

  1. Review the 4 "KB article" references for terminology consistency
  2. Consider future standardization of "knowledgebase" vs "technotes" directory naming

Great work on this extensive documentation update! 🎉

@bturlea bturlea marked this pull request as ready for review November 11, 2025 19:11
@bturlea bturlea requested a review from a team as a code owner November 11, 2025 19:11
@bturlea bturlea merged commit ed73e6e into dev Nov 11, 2025
5 checks passed
@bturlea bturlea deleted the feature/URL-and-other-changes branch November 11, 2025 19:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants