Replies: 3 comments
-
Diego! I'm sure you can do more to troubleshoot this problem 😄 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Courtesy of a beloved common friend ;)
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Mucb better. Nextflow does not override anymore the container entrypoint as of version 22.08 https://github.com/nextflow-io/nextflow/blob/master/changelog.txt#L169 You can use the following env variable to preserve the old behaviour, but at some point it will go away
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Bug report
Expected behavior and actual behavior
I have a CI Github action that runs a Nextflow pipeline on a test dataset, after installing Nextflow itself. It runs the pipeline within a Docker container via the
-with-docker
option. After the last Nextflow update (20.10.0), without changing the pipeline, I found that the CI failed. After a couple of checks, it seems to work when using a previous version of Nextflow, e.g.NXF_VER=20.04.0
. The same behaviour is observed when running the pipeline directly on Mac OS and Linux. It also works independently of the Nextflow version if using-with-singularity
instead, so the problem seems related to the link Nextflow-Docker.Steps to reproduce the problem
You can try running
nextflow run guigolab/sqtlseeker2-nf -with-docker
.You can also fork/clone the repo, make some edit in the README, push and check the outcome of the action.
Program output
It complains about a missing output file, but I believe it is related to the fact that it can't run within the container.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions