Replies: 1 comment
-
Could you please share a minimal reproducible example? One in which locally it works fine, but on Google Batch it doesn't? By the way, you mean |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi,
Recently, I realized that when using
google-batch
as executor, and applyingmap
orfilter
operators on aChannel
, the result is not as expected.Consider this scenario:
Let's assume that
sample2.fasta
exists, and the others are not.So, it is expected to have
new_samples
like this:However, it is not always the case... sometimes I get results like this:
Which means that the channel elements get mixed up... and make the results unrealiable.
This was only a simple example... I used
splitCsv
,map
, andfilter
in different settings, and again the results are not reliable and the channel tuples get mixed up.Is this a bug, or I'm missing something?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions