Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 86.94%. Comparing base (a82c2ba) to head (e9e1178).

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3740      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   86.95%   86.94%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         128      128              
  Lines       15986    15986              
  Branches       62       62              
==========================================
- Hits        13900    13899       -1     
- Misses       1919     1921       +2     
+ Partials      167      166       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

For testing can you run the functional tests locally a few times (i know the pipeline runs it 4 times) to make sure there aren't any flakey situations? Also can you verify the readiness probes are applied in the deployments when the tests are running?

@bjee19 After running them several times, the tracing test failed once. I'm not sure how to fix it, as there are readiness probes and we are waiting for them to be ready. It's mentioned in a comment here

@sarthyparty Yea that looks like its probably not an issue with the example apps not being ready in time (something that wouldn't get fixed with the readiness probes) so the other tests passing consistently is good. Were you also able to verify the readiness probes in the deployment yaml as the apps were rolling out?

I saw the readiness probe on the pod and deployment when I described them