Choose a new API that requires a token for authorization #434
toby-thanathip
started this conversation in
RFCs
Replies: 1 comment 4 replies
-
@toby-thanathip Do we need to include the API in the template though? It seems pretty likely that the generated project is going to update their |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
4 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Related to: #382
As of now, our project is using an API that doesn't require a token for authorization.
Because we are planning to add Authenticator to our templates, we need a token for this.
Now the main question is, which API should we use? Here are some options:
Then it finally hit me that we require an API, which supports OAuth 🙈
1️⃣ There are several options available, it's nice we can work with a real API, but there are some downsides:
2️⃣ The second option is to create a mock server with Postman, sadly this is not a real API, but it has its benefits: 🚀
3️⃣ The final option is, don't add
Authenticator
to our templates and keep the current API.→ But if all the clients require it, then we must add it anyways.
4️⃣ Any other option? I'm all ears
4 votes ·
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions