Skip to content

[Feature Request] - Improve community contributions #11

@onmax

Description

@onmax

Suggestions for improvement

Community interaction and feedback

  1. Quick Feedback System: It's become clear that many of the locations listed on the map are either out of date or incorrect. To address this, it would be beneficial to implement a quick feedback system that allows users to easily report inaccuracies. This would help keep the map accurate and up to date.

  2. Like/Dislike and thermometer feature: The reintroduction of a like/dislike feature, similar to the old YouTube model, could provide immediate feedback on the reliability of listed locations. In addition, adding a "thermometer" feature could indicate which businesses have recently accepted crypto, giving users a quick way to identify trustworthy places.

  3. Leaderboards and rewards: Introducing leaderboards to showcase top contributors could motivate more users to participate. A "zap" feature could also be added to allow users to recognise and reward the efforts of trusted editors, fostering a sense of community appreciation.

  4. Streamlined Edit Approvals: Implement a system where edits from high quality editors are fast-tracked for approval. This would ensure that reliable updates are reflected on the map more quickly, improving the overall user experience.

Trust, verification and collaboration

  1. Editor verification: Establish a system that verifies edits based on the editor's history. This would help users trust the information provided and maintain the credibility of the map.

  2. Business verification: A major problem reported by users is that some businesses listed as accepting crypto don't actually do so. Implementing a verification system where users can confirm that businesses accept crypto would greatly reduce this problem. In addition, allowing businesses to register themselves as crypto-friendly could improve accuracy.

  3. Local Editing Teams: Forming local editing teams with tools such as dedicated Telegram groups could facilitate real-time discussion and better coordination of edits in specific areas.

Technical considerations

  1. Authentication system: Although efforts have been made to avoid using a backend with authentication, it seems necessary to implement one to improve the reliability of the system. Using the Nimiq wallet for authentication could provide a secure and streamlined solution.

Improve search algorithm

  1. Allow users to use keywords or products that the businness might sell. For example: "Chinese Restaurant"

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions