@@ -95,24 +95,3 @@ References
95
95
Correction for geometric distortion in echo planar images from B0
96
96
field variations Magn. Reson. Med., 34 (1) (1995), pp. 65-73,
97
97
doi:`10.1002/mrm.1910340111 <https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910340111 >`_.
98
-
99
- .. [Hutton2002 ] Hutton et al., Image Distortion Correction in fMRI: A Quantitative
100
- Evaluation, NeuroImage 16(1):217-240, 2002. doi:`10.1006/nimg.2001.1054
101
- <https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.1054> `_.
102
-
103
- .. [Huntenburg2014 ] Huntenburg, J. M. (2014) Evaluating Nonlinear
104
- Coregistration of BOLD EPI and T1w Images. Berlin: Master
105
- Thesis, Freie Universität. `PDF
106
- <http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/pubman/item/escidoc:2327525:5/component/escidoc:2327523/master_thesis_huntenburg_4686947.pdf> `_.
107
-
108
- .. [Treiber2016 ] Treiber, J. M. et al. (2016) Characterization and Correction
109
- of Geometric Distortions in 814 Diffusion Weighted Images,
110
- PLoS ONE 11(3): e0152472. doi:`10.1371/journal.pone.0152472
111
- <https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152472> `_.
112
-
113
- .. [Wang2017 ] Wang S, et al. (2017) Evaluation of Field Map and Nonlinear
114
- Registration Methods for Correction of Susceptibility Artifacts
115
- in Diffusion MRI. Front. Neuroinform. 11:17.
116
- doi:`10.3389/fninf.2017.00017
117
- <https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2017.00017> `_.
118
-
0 commit comments