|
1 | 1 | # Licensing and Derived Works
|
2 | 2 |
|
| 3 | +The *NiPreps* community believes that software is an integral component of |
| 4 | +scientific practice, and that any scientific claim must be verifiable by |
| 5 | +following the chain of reasoning from observation to conclusion. |
| 6 | +To achieve this, software must be free to use, inspect, and critique. |
| 7 | +We also believe that you should be free to modify our software to improve it or |
| 8 | +adapt it to new use cases. |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | +As software development is a dynamic process, code modifications can quickly |
| 11 | +become confusing as the original and modified versions depart from each other. |
| 12 | +For the sake of transparency and verification, when you modify our code, |
| 13 | +we ask that you document both the version of the software that you started with |
| 14 | +and the changes you make. |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +We believe these freedoms are best promoted by distributing our software under |
| 17 | +free/open source software licenses, and the license we feel best promotes these |
| 18 | +goals is the Apache License, Version 2.0. |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +This page outlines our commitment to transparent development and our |
| 21 | +expectations for developers who adapt *NiPreps* code to use in other projects. |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +## Licensing of NiPreps projects |
| 24 | + |
3 | 25 | All software packages and tools under the *NiPreps* umbrella must be licensed under the [Apache License 2.0](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0) by default, unless otherwise stated.
|
4 | 26 | The authors of new *NiPreps* packages may not abide by this general rule of thumb if necessary and/or sufficiently justified (e.g., the source code is actually derived from a product licensed under a copyleft license).
|
5 | 27 |
|
|
0 commit comments