Skip to content

patient_birth_date dtype should be signed integer in nibabel.ecat #1434

@mcsitter

Description

@mcsitter

Hi,

I noticed that in nibabel/ecat.py, the patient_birth_date field is defined as:

('patient_birth_date', np.uint32),

This causes incorrect date interpretations, for example producing birth dates in the future rather than before the Unix epoch. It seems this field should be a signed integer (np.int32) to correctly handle dates.

At least in the ECAT files I have, patient_birth_date must be signed integers to interpret dates correctly. Tools like Vinci read these files correctly when treated as signed.

Example:

import numpy as np
import datetime, calendar

# 19 Dec 1915 at midnight UTC
ts = calendar.timegm(datetime.datetime(1915, 12, 19).timetuple())

# Structured array with wrong dtype
dtype_wrong = [('patient_birth_date', np.uint32)]
arr_wrong = np.array([(ts,)], dtype=dtype_wrong)

# Structured array with correct dtype
dtype_right = [('patient_birth_date', np.int32)]
arr_right = np.array([(ts,)], dtype=dtype_right)

# Convert back to datetime
dt_wrong = datetime.datetime.utcfromtimestamp(arr_wrong['patient_birth_date'][0])
dt_right = datetime.datetime.utcfromtimestamp(arr_right['patient_birth_date'][0])

print("Unsigned (wrong):", arr_wrong['patient_birth_date'][0], "->", dt_wrong)
print("Signed (correct):", arr_right['patient_birth_date'][0], "->", dt_right)

Example output:

Unsigned (wrong): 2589690496 -> 2052-01-24 06:28:16
Signed (correct): -1705276800 -> 1915-12-19 00:00:00

Changing it to np.int32 fixes this issue. I can also prepare a PR for this update if that’s helpful.

Thanks!

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions