Replies: 2 comments
-
I'm calling it by hand but it annoys me as well, managed to track it down to here in the source Considering @MrHinsh any insight? I couldn't really tell from the commit and PR. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
@ALTrijssenaar has just added a PR #1439 that changes the default behaviour to support this. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
We're calling the tool automatically and in case of a failure (e.g. exit code -1) we like to start another process. Unfortunately the execution is always returning -1. Any ideas how we could catch a runtime failure? Thanks
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions