Work Item Type Capitalization / Missing mapping issue #1940
Unanswered
StainlessSteelDream
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
witadmin listwitd /collection:---- |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
-
I am also facing the same issue. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I'm getting some odd work item mapping errors, seeing the same Work Item Type with different capitalization being found (see bloew)
21:07:51 WRN] [v14.4.6] Validating::WorkItemTypes::targetWorkItemTypes::There are 3 WorkItemTypes that are used in the history of the Source and that do not exist in the Target. These will all need mapped using
WorkItemTypeDefinition
in the config.[21:07:51 WRN] [v14.4.6] Validating::WorkItemTypes::targetWorkItemTypes::New Feature::Mapped? False
[21:07:51 WRN] [v14.4.6] Validating::WorkItemTypes::targetWorkItemTypes::New feature::Mapped? True
[21:07:51 WRN] [v14.4.6] Validating::WorkItemTypes::targetWorkItemTypes::Product Backlog Item::Mapped? True
but odder on the source project witadmin listwitd command does not show these work item types at all. At some time in the past the "New feature" work item type was renamed using the witadmin command, but the history seems to have the old name (2 names?) in it.
Anyone have a suggestion on what I can put in the config file to address this, or how to cleanup the wit items in the source?
I cannot use:
"WorkItemTypeDefinition": {
"Product Backlog Item": "User Story",
"New feature": "Feature",
"New Feature": "Feature",
},
as this gives a "A duplicate key 'WorkItemTypeDefinition:New Feature' was found."error
Thanks
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions