You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I cant find this anywhere obvious (my brain just might be looking at it wrong after 15.5 hrs of migrating work items).
When I go to a work item that has a good link to a commit, then go to the commit history, then details:
The Description section has bad links in it still. Is this expected? It appears like its just keeping the old work item ID for the description, which is creating a link to an already existing work item in our target org.
The work items at the bottom show the correct new ID/work items, so its not a huge issue, but a pain point our devs are wondering about.
Any advice would be appreciated. Just looking for a definitive answer so I can stop beating my head against the wall!
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I cant find this anywhere obvious (my brain just might be looking at it wrong after 15.5 hrs of migrating work items).
When I go to a work item that has a good link to a commit, then go to the commit history, then details:
The Description section has bad links in it still. Is this expected? It appears like its just keeping the old work item ID for the description, which is creating a link to an already existing work item in our target org.
The work items at the bottom show the correct new ID/work items, so its not a huge issue, but a pain point our devs are wondering about.
Any advice would be appreciated. Just looking for a definitive answer so I can stop beating my head against the wall!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions