Skip to content

URI contents #11

@mpresteg

Description

@mpresteg

Part of the beauty of the URI is the flexibility it provides. However, as a consumer of HML (for instance), if I'm interested to follow the consensus-sequence URI, what may I expect to find on the other side? Is it resolvable by a machine? If so, some context (a content type) or something would seem helpful. As a community can we establish this context even if we don't wish to constrain the specification with it?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions