Skip to content

Conversation

@mike-git374
Copy link

@mike-git374 mike-git374 commented Jan 3, 2026

This implements Proposal 1 of issue #61235

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/sqlite

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. sqlite Issues and PRs related to the SQLite subsystem. labels Jan 3, 2026
Copy link
Member

@himself65 himself65 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you please update the test case?

@mike-git374
Copy link
Author

I updated all tests with statement.set* functions

Copy link
Member

@Renegade334 Renegade334 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm -0.5 on this, as repeated calls across the JS-C++ boundary to set statement options is a very much less efficient paradigm than the alternative proposal, which was to allow options to be passed to prepare(). Passing a consolidated options object to set statement options also matches the pattern already in use in the database constructor.

@mike-git374
Copy link
Author

mike-git374 commented Jan 3, 2026

I updated the issue to address this and now recommend db.prepare(sql[, options]) as an alternative to or in addition to this PR

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 3, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 88.53%. Comparing base (95852d7) to head (302305c).
⚠️ Report is 41 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #61263      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.54%   88.53%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         704      704              
  Lines      208753   208757       +4     
  Branches    40280    40288       +8     
==========================================
- Hits       184847   184820      -27     
- Misses      15907    15952      +45     
+ Partials     7999     7985      -14     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/node_sqlite.cc 80.20% <100.00%> (+0.03%) ⬆️

... and 29 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@mike-git374
Copy link
Author

Closing in favor of Proposal 2

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. sqlite Issues and PRs related to the SQLite subsystem.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants