-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
Add support for argument mutation in complex argument functions #22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
d207977 to
3714811
Compare
Shouldn't a test be failing if that's the case? |
|
nah there was no test for argument mutation, so i had to write one, and i only wrote it for function declaration, not for class constructor, i'll try to write one later to see if i'm right, but from what i can tell, the function that handles constructors doesn't go through my code path so i assume it doesn't work. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bizob2828 asked me to review this PR on our temporary fork so I thought I should review this upstream since it is originally your PR!
Closes #20
I think it doesn't work with class constructor rewrite ?
DISCLAIMER:
I have no idea what i'm doing, i'm only trying random stuff until the compiler and the tests are happy. Don't assume anything is correct.