chore: use bool for ValidationFlag fields #77

jialinli98 · 2025-08-07T01:59:50Z

Description

Problem*

use bool for push_layer, push_layer_type_of_root, and pop_layer.

closes #57

Summary*

Additional Context

PR Checklist*

I have tested the changes locally.
I have formatted the changes with Prettier and/or cargo fmt on default settings.

TomAFrench · 2025-08-07T10:51:18Z

It seems like there's three options for the layer type however:

noir_json_parser/src/enums.nr

Lines 25 to 29 in 69b1435

    
           pub(crate) mod Layer { 
        
               pub(crate) global OBJECT_LAYER: u32 = 0; 
        
               pub(crate) global ARRAY_LAYER: u32 = 1; 
        
               pub(crate) global SINGLE_VALUE_LAYER: u32 = 2; 
        
           }

Looks like this needs more investigation.

jialinli98 · 2025-08-07T16:44:31Z

noir_json_parser/src/transcript_entry.nr

Line 42 in 10146b0

    
           assert(r.push_layer_type_of_root * r.push_layer_type_of_root == r.push_layer_type_of_root);

single_value_layer isn't used in the implementation, as standalone values are not supported by this library. Previously, we also checked that this value was a boolean.

TomAFrench · 2025-08-08T09:28:26Z

Ok, can you remove this from the enum in that case?

…into jl/token_validation_in_bool

src/transcript_entry.nr

…-lang/noir_json_parser into jl/token_validation_in_bool

github-actions

ACIR Opcodes

Benchmark suite	Current: `4fda91d`	Previous: `38f3f26`	Ratio
`get_array_JSON16kb_Bench.json/main`	`42557` acir_opcodes	`42557` acir_opcodes	`1`
`get_array_JSON512b_Bench.json/main`	`2365` acir_opcodes	`2365` acir_opcodes	`1`
`get_keys_at_root_JSON16kb_Bench.json/main`	`3331178` acir_opcodes	`3331178` acir_opcodes	`1`
`get_keys_at_root_JSON512b_Bench.json/main`	`3315306` acir_opcodes	`3315306` acir_opcodes	`1`
`get_literal_JSON16kb_Bench.json/main`	`17709` acir_opcodes	`17709` acir_opcodes	`1`
`get_literal_JSON512b_Bench.json/main`	`1837` acir_opcodes	`1837` acir_opcodes	`1`
`get_number_JSON16kb_Bench.json/main`	`17836` acir_opcodes	`17836` acir_opcodes	`1`
`get_number_JSON512b_Bench.json/main`	`1964` acir_opcodes	`1964` acir_opcodes	`1`
`get_object_JSON16kb_Bench.json/main`	`42557` acir_opcodes	`42557` acir_opcodes	`1`
`get_object_JSON512b_Bench.json/main`	`2365` acir_opcodes	`2365` acir_opcodes	`1`
`get_string_JSON16kb_Bench.json/main`	`43258` acir_opcodes	`43258` acir_opcodes	`1`
`get_string_JSON512b_Bench.json/main`	`27386` acir_opcodes	`27386` acir_opcodes	`1`
`get_value_JSON16kb_Bench.json/main`	`20747` acir_opcodes	`20747` acir_opcodes	`1`
`get_value_JSON512b_Bench.json/main`	`4875` acir_opcodes	`4875` acir_opcodes	`1`
`key_exists_JSON16kb_Bench.json/main`	`18077` acir_opcodes	`18077` acir_opcodes	`1`
`key_exists_JSON512b_Bench.json/main`	`2205` acir_opcodes	`2205` acir_opcodes	`1`
`parse_json_from_string_JSON16kb_Bench.json/main`	`1100710` acir_opcodes	`1098668` acir_opcodes	`1.00`
`parse_json_from_string_JSON512b_Bench.json/main`	`38237` acir_opcodes	`38179` acir_opcodes	`1.00`

This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.

github-actions

Circuit Size

Benchmark suite	Current: `4fda91d`	Previous: `38f3f26`	Ratio
`get_array_JSON16kb_Bench.json/main`	`54968` circuit_size	`54968` circuit_size	`1`
`get_array_JSON512b_Bench.json/main`	`5848` circuit_size	`5848` circuit_size	`1`
`get_keys_at_root_JSON16kb_Bench.json/main`	`3310898` circuit_size	`3310898` circuit_size	`1`
`get_keys_at_root_JSON512b_Bench.json/main`	`3285104` circuit_size	`3285104` circuit_size	`1`
`get_literal_JSON16kb_Bench.json/main`	`32182` circuit_size	`32182` circuit_size	`1`
`get_literal_JSON512b_Bench.json/main`	`6388` circuit_size	`6388` circuit_size	`1`
`get_number_JSON16kb_Bench.json/main`	`32611` circuit_size	`32611` circuit_size	`1`
`get_number_JSON512b_Bench.json/main`	`6882` circuit_size	`6882` circuit_size	`1`
`get_object_JSON16kb_Bench.json/main`	`54968` circuit_size	`54968` circuit_size	`1`
`get_object_JSON512b_Bench.json/main`	`5848` circuit_size	`5848` circuit_size	`1`
`get_string_JSON16kb_Bench.json/main`	`75573` circuit_size	`75573` circuit_size	`1`
`get_string_JSON512b_Bench.json/main`	`50741` circuit_size	`50741` circuit_size	`1`
`get_value_JSON16kb_Bench.json/main`	`36167` circuit_size	`36167` circuit_size	`1`
`get_value_JSON512b_Bench.json/main`	`10373` circuit_size	`10373` circuit_size	`1`
`key_exists_JSON16kb_Bench.json/main`	`31277` circuit_size	`31277` circuit_size	`1`
`key_exists_JSON512b_Bench.json/main`	`9452` circuit_size	`9452` circuit_size	`1`
`parse_json_from_string_JSON16kb_Bench.json/main`	`1475290` circuit_size	`1473490` circuit_size	`1.00`
`parse_json_from_string_JSON512b_Bench.json/main`	`68579` circuit_size	`68763` circuit_size	`1.00`

This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.

github-actions

Brillig Bytecode Size

Benchmark suite	Current: `4fda91d`	Previous: `38f3f26`	Ratio
`get_array_JSON16kb_Bench`	`18499` opcodes	`18499` opcodes	`1`
`get_array_JSON512b_Bench`	`2627` opcodes	`2627` opcodes	`1`
`get_keys_at_root_JSON16kb_Bench`	`43577` opcodes	`43577` opcodes	`1`
`get_keys_at_root_JSON512b_Bench`	`27704` opcodes	`27704` opcodes	`1`
`get_literal_JSON16kb_Bench`	`22291` opcodes	`22291` opcodes	`1`
`get_literal_JSON512b_Bench`	`6418` opcodes	`6418` opcodes	`1`
`get_number_JSON16kb_Bench`	`22601` opcodes	`22601` opcodes	`1`
`get_number_JSON512b_Bench`	`6728` opcodes	`6728` opcodes	`1`
`get_object_JSON16kb_Bench`	`18499` opcodes	`18499` opcodes	`1`
`get_object_JSON512b_Bench`	`2627` opcodes	`2627` opcodes	`1`
`get_string_JSON16kb_Bench`	`24349` opcodes	`24349` opcodes	`1`
`get_string_JSON512b_Bench`	`8476` opcodes	`8476` opcodes	`1`
`get_value_JSON16kb_Bench`	`23399` opcodes	`23399` opcodes	`1`
`get_value_JSON512b_Bench`	`7526` opcodes	`7526` opcodes	`1`
`key_exists_JSON16kb_Bench`	`18131` opcodes	`18131` opcodes	`1`
`key_exists_JSON512b_Bench`	`2259` opcodes	`2259` opcodes	`1`
`parse_json_from_string_JSON16kb_Bench`	`16563` opcodes	`16817` opcodes	`0.98`
`parse_json_from_string_JSON512b_Bench`	`16552` opcodes	`16806` opcodes	`0.98`

This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.

TomAFrench · 2025-08-22T10:33:34Z

Ok, can you remove this from the enum in that case?

Can you please address this comment?

github-project-automation bot added this to Noir Libraries Aug 7, 2025

github-project-automation bot moved this to 👀 To Triage in Noir Libraries Aug 7, 2025

use bool for token validation fields

c7661ba

jialinli98 force-pushed the jl/token_validation_in_bool branch from 15b7da2 to c7661ba Compare August 7, 2025 02:17

jialinli98 changed the title ~~chore: use bool for token validation fields~~ chore: use bool for ValidationFlag fields Aug 7, 2025

jialinli98 requested a review from TomAFrench August 7, 2025 02:51

Merge branch 'main' into jl/token_validation_in_bool

aa04046

Merge branch 'main' of https://github.com/noir-lang/noir_json_parser …

419fd3f

…into jl/token_validation_in_bool

TomAFrench added the bench-show label Aug 11, 2025

TomAFrench reviewed Aug 11, 2025

View reviewed changes

src/transcript_entry.nr Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

jialinli98 added 2 commits August 11, 2025 17:55

to_field

866756f

Merge branch 'jl/token_validation_in_bool' of https://github.com/noir…

0eda9c6

…-lang/noir_json_parser into jl/token_validation_in_bool

github-actions bot reviewed Aug 12, 2025

View reviewed changes

jialinli98 added 2 commits August 13, 2025 09:53

Merge branch 'main' into jl/token_validation_in_bool

239a070

Merge branch 'main' into jl/token_validation_in_bool

c705871

jialinli98 and others added 7 commits August 25, 2025 17:15

Merge branch 'main' into jl/token_validation_in_bool

126c8b7

new

1cc89f6

incremental change

98217cb

more change

e4a779b

remove single layer

3c26548

merge

07bc4fb

lint

1c02a14

jialinli98 force-pushed the jl/token_validation_in_bool branch from 48ff34a to 1c02a14 Compare August 26, 2025 04:40

jialinli98 requested a review from TomAFrench August 26, 2025 05:46

Merge branch 'main' into jl/token_validation_in_bool

4fda91d

TomAFrench approved these changes Sep 1, 2025

View reviewed changes

TomAFrench merged commit fdeb176 into main Sep 1, 2025
18 checks passed

github-project-automation bot moved this from 👀 To Triage to ✅ Done in Noir Libraries Sep 1, 2025

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

chore: use bool for ValidationFlag fields #77

chore: use bool for ValidationFlag fields #77

Uh oh!

jialinli98 commented Aug 7, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

TomAFrench commented Aug 7, 2025

Uh oh!

jialinli98 commented Aug 7, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

TomAFrench commented Aug 8, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions bot left a comment •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

github-actions bot left a comment •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

github-actions bot left a comment •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

TomAFrench commented Aug 22, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

chore: use bool for ValidationFlag fields #77

chore: use bool for ValidationFlag fields #77

Uh oh!

Conversation

jialinli98 commented Aug 7, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Description

Problem*

Summary*

Additional Context

PR Checklist*

Uh oh!

TomAFrench commented Aug 7, 2025

Uh oh!

jialinli98 commented Aug 7, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

TomAFrench commented Aug 8, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions bot left a comment • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

ACIR Opcodes

Uh oh!

github-actions bot left a comment • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Circuit Size

Uh oh!

github-actions bot left a comment • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Brillig Bytecode Size

Uh oh!

TomAFrench commented Aug 22, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

jialinli98 commented Aug 7, 2025 •

edited

Loading

jialinli98 commented Aug 7, 2025 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot left a comment •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot left a comment •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot left a comment •

edited

Loading