README.md

deepseek-rag

Is RAG use worth it?

	Deepseek	Deepseek + Contextual RAG
Accuracy*
Relevance*
Latency

Following Wang et al (2024)'s "Best Practices in RAG"

A typical RAG workflow:

Query classification ->	Retrieval ->	Reranking ->	Repacking ->	Summarisation
Determining whether retrieval is necessary for a given input query	Efficiently obtaining relevant documents for the query	Refining the order of retrieved documents based on their relevance to the query	Organizing the retrieved documents into a structured one for better generation	Extracting key information from the repacked document and eliminating redundancies

Implementation, based on Anthropic's Introducing Contextual Retrieval, 2024.

The project is mostly based on LlamaIndex for retrieval. First time using LlamaIndex. Easy integration, hefty documentation.

Pipeline component	specification	motivation
Chunking strategy	semantic level chunking with chunk boundaries at document sections, chunk overlap ?	document structure
Embedding method	E5	great for long and dense legal text
Choice of vector db
Hybrid retrieval	BM25(based on TF-IDF) + embeddings	precise word/phrase matching + sentence-level embeddings
Number of chunks (k)	20	recommended by Anthropic (not empirially tested here)

Deployment notes:

1. ! Note: FAISS is unstable on python 3.11. Use python 3.10.

• Manual evaluation metrics from Deriu et al, ....