Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
|
This is a great question and here is a partial answer: yes, there are plans to extend dmrpp support to more collections and standardize the way they are generated and provided. This falls into OPeNDAP and NASA Earth roadmaps so I don't have a timeline from the earthaccess side. Perhaps @jgallagher59701 @Mikejmnez knows more about the overall plan. Aside from this, I'd think that for Cloud-Optimized Geo-TIF (HLS) there is no need for a chunk mapping file (dmrpp), since the rasterio/gdal drivers can take advantage of the internal metadata and get to the bytes in an efficient -cloud optimized- way. If your workflows include data from HDF5 or NetCDF files then the dmrpp path becomes way more attractive than generating the reference ourselves (kerchunk). We're working on improving these access patterns even further with the support of |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thank you very much for your quick response and feedback. Would you have a minimal code example of how we can use |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi everyone,
I'm currently integrating earthaccess into our tool Terragon and would love to use the open_virtual_mfdataset() function for streamlined cloud data access. However, for several collections (such as HLS or Sentinel-1), I encounter the well-known error that a required DMR++ file is missing.
Is there a general plan or roadmap for expanding DMR++/virtual dataset support to more collections?
Should we expect wider compatibility in the near future, or is this functionality likely to remain experimental and limited to a subset of datasets?
Knowing this will help us decide whether to rely on these experimental features, or to develop our own workflows using lower-level tools like rasterio.
Thanks for your efforts and for any guidance you can provide!
Best regards,
Paul
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions