Skip to content

doc: improve ordered doc#3304

Merged
vaibhavtiwari33 merged 3 commits intomainfrom
improve-ordered-doc
Mar 12, 2026
Merged

doc: improve ordered doc#3304
vaibhavtiwari33 merged 3 commits intomainfrom
improve-ordered-doc

Conversation

@vigith
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@vigith vigith commented Mar 11, 2026

Closes: #3277

  • Fix typo in the doc section of CRD definition in controller types definition
  • 1,2,3 from @th0ger

vigith added 2 commits March 11, 2026 11:44
Signed-off-by: Vigith Maurice <vigith@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Vigith Maurice <vigith@gmail.com>
@vigith vigith marked this pull request as ready for review March 11, 2026 18:46
@vigith vigith requested review from whynowy and yhl25 as code owners March 11, 2026 18:46
@vigith vigith requested a review from vaibhavtiwari33 March 11, 2026 18:46
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Mar 11, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 81.09%. Comparing base (7cee4a6) to head (d0bee19).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3304      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   81.04%   81.09%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         316      316              
  Lines       72304    72304              
==========================================
+ Hits        58598    58634      +36     
+ Misses      13151    13110      -41     
- Partials      555      560       +5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Signed-off-by: Vigith Maurice <vigith@gmail.com>

Co-authored-by: Vaibhav Kant Tiwari <vaibhav.tiwari33@gmail.com>
@vigith vigith requested a review from vaibhavtiwari33 March 11, 2026 22:13
@vigith vigith mentioned this pull request Mar 11, 2026
@vaibhavtiwari33 vaibhavtiwari33 merged commit d680b2e into main Mar 12, 2026
27 checks passed
@vaibhavtiwari33 vaibhavtiwari33 deleted the improve-ordered-doc branch March 12, 2026 15:17
@th0ger
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

th0ger commented Mar 16, 2026

Thanks, much clearer docs now.

@th0ger
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

th0ger commented Mar 16, 2026

@vigith The ordering-docs stresses the ordered processing does not provide event time ordering. But since we support that via accumulator/stream-sorter, maybe link to those docs and/or examples, so readers a not caught in a dead end?

@vigith
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

vigith commented Mar 22, 2026

@vigith The ordering-docs stresses the ordered processing does not provide event time ordering. But since we support that via accumulator/stream-sorter, maybe link to those docs and/or examples, so readers a not caught in a dead end?

#3328

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Documentation on Ordered Processing

3 participants