the AST of comment, superscript , and subscript and spoiler #8
Description
Should we make the comment,superscript ,subscript similar to attachModifier? As it stands, for extension development, a significant amount of work is required to filter out the entire content of the comment.
I test on the following content
%This is a comment, and you never see it in your exported output.%
This is ^superscript^ (it won't render properly in Neovim).
This is ,subscript, (same as above).
it shows as blow
Paragraph([Token(Special('%')), Token(Text("This")), Token(Whitespace), Token(Text("is")), Token(Whitespace), Token(Text("a")), Token(Whitespace), Token(Text("comment")), Token(Special(',')), Token(Whitespace), Token(Text("and")), Token(Whitespace), Token(Text("you")), Token(Whitespace), Token(Text("never")), Token(Whitespace), Token(Text("see")), Token(Whitespace), Token(Text("it")), Token(Whitespace), Token(Text("in")), Token(Whitespace), Token(Text("your")), Token(Whitespace), Token(Text("exported")), Token(Whitespace), Token(Text("output")), Token(Special('.')), Token(Special('%')), Token(Whitespace), Token(Text("This")), Token(Whitespace), Token(Text("is")), Token(Whitespace), Token(Special('^')), Token(Text("superscript")), Token(Special('^')), Token(Whitespace), Token(Special('(')), Token(Text("it")), Token(Whitespace), Token(Text("won")), Token(Special('\'')), Token(Text("t")), Token(Whitespace), Token(Text("render")), Token(Whitespace), Token(Text("properly")), Token(Whitespace), Token(Text("in")), Token(Whitespace), Token(Text("Neovim")), Token(Special(')')), Token(Special('.')), Token(Whitespace), Token(Text("This")), Token(Whitespace), Token(Text("is")), Token(Whitespace), Token(Special(',')), Token(Text("subscript")), Token(Special(',')), Token(Whitespace), Token(Special('(')), Token(Text("same")), Token(Whitespace), Token(Text("as")), Token(Whitespace), Token(Text("above")), Token(Special(')')), Token(Special('.'))])