Replies: 1 comment
-
Hi there, The main difference you're seeing is because the GMAT setup includes the JGM2 gravity field with a 4x4 but the setup un Nyx does not. You'll want to setup the propagator similar to how it's done here: nyx/tests/mission_design/orbitaldyn.rs Line 893 in 2c4facb I hope this helps. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi, I have some questions on the propagator validation / accuracy.
I have the following Input Vector:
{
epoch: 1672562471200, // 2023-01-01T08:41:11.200Z
px: 4023.3885631619813,
py: 2295.3829421046115,
pz: -5048.048507712205,
vx: 5.505020806246804,
vy: 1.4725984148977468,
vz: 5.061557060430501
}
And this code:
Nyx prorogaties this over 14642397 milliseconds. It returns this Vector:
┌ ┐
│ -6157.447144534038 │
│ -2627.8513244002433 │
│ 1375.397964296156 │
│ -1.803803312859318 │
│ .3201275241241115 │
│ -7.417566789943529 │
└ ┘
When I run this same state vector through RK89 Propogation in GMAT, with, what I believe are the same settings (attached). I get this Vector:
Screenshot 2023-06-26 at 9 51 47 PM
┌ ┐
│ -6120.747335306143 │
│ -2656.585734678817 │
│ 1539.019862109160 │
│ -1.968968660807117 │
│ .2413706536038857 │
│ -7.368889935403013 │
│ -6120.747335306419 │
│ -2656.585734677576 │
│ 1539.019862111372 │
│ -1.968968660809157 │
│ .2413706536033870 │
│ -7.368889935402240 │
└ ┘
Am I setting up my NYX propagator wrong? What could be generating these deviations?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions