@@ -29,22 +29,33 @@ overview and design details, see
29
29
30
30
- ` src/account/ ` - Account structures, balances, permissions
31
31
32
- ## Critical Issues
32
+ ## Status
33
+
34
+ The ledger components have proven reliable on devnet despite technical debt
35
+ patterns. The implementation maintains the same battle-tested logic that runs
36
+ the Mina network.
37
+
38
+ ## Issues for Improvement
33
39
34
40
** Error Handling**
35
41
36
- - Too many ` .unwrap() ` and ` .expect() ` calls in production code paths (excluding
37
- tests)
38
- - Critical transaction processing paths could panic the node
39
- - Inconsistent error handling across modules
42
+ - Extensive use of ` .unwrap() ` and ` .expect() ` calls in code paths, particularly
43
+ in ` scan_state/transaction_logic.rs ` , ` staged_ledger/staged_ledger.rs ` , and
44
+ ` transaction_pool.rs `
45
+ - These calls are generally in code paths with well-understood preconditions but
46
+ could benefit from explicit error propagation
47
+ - Inconsistent error handling patterns across modules
40
48
- Verification key lookup bug fix from upstream Mina Protocol needs to be ported
41
49
(https://github.com/MinaProtocol/mina/pull/16699 )
42
50
43
51
** Monolithic Structure**
44
52
45
- - Single massive crate with files exceeding 6,000+ lines
46
- - Deep coupling between components that should be independent
47
- - Hard to maintain, test, and develop in parallel
53
+ - Large files like ` scan_state/transaction_logic.rs ` and
54
+ ` staged_ledger/staged_ledger.rs ` mirror OCaml's structure and are difficult to
55
+ navigate
56
+ - Files contain embedded tests that are hard to discover
57
+ - When modifying these files, prefer small targeted changes over major
58
+ restructuring
48
59
49
60
** Performance**
50
61
@@ -53,6 +64,7 @@ overview and design details, see
53
64
unnecessary deep clones for sparse ledger construction
54
65
- Transaction pool operations clone transaction objects with acknowledged TODO
55
66
comments about performance
67
+ - Performance monitoring infrastructure exists but is disabled
56
68
- No memory pooling or reuse strategies (could help with memory fragmentation in
57
69
WASM)
58
70
@@ -63,6 +75,12 @@ overview and design details, see
63
75
comprehensive global solution (see persistence.md)
64
76
- Thread-local caching holds memory indefinitely
65
77
78
+ ** Code Organization**
79
+
80
+ - Multiple TODO/FIXME items throughout the codebase requiring attention
81
+ - Incomplete implementations in ` sparse_ledger/mod.rs ` with unimplemented trait
82
+ methods
83
+
66
84
## Refactoring Plan
67
85
68
86
** Phase 1: Safety**
0 commit comments