Skip to content

Commit 2a1d625

Browse files
tizocdannywillems
authored andcommitted
docs(handover): Update ledger summary
1 parent 5ff67c3 commit 2a1d625

File tree

1 file changed

+26
-8
lines changed

1 file changed

+26
-8
lines changed

ledger/summary.md

Lines changed: 26 additions & 8 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -29,22 +29,33 @@ overview and design details, see
2929

3030
- `src/account/` - Account structures, balances, permissions
3131

32-
## Critical Issues
32+
## Status
33+
34+
The ledger components have proven reliable on devnet despite technical debt
35+
patterns. The implementation maintains the same battle-tested logic that runs
36+
the Mina network.
37+
38+
## Issues for Improvement
3339

3440
**Error Handling**
3541

36-
- Too many `.unwrap()` and `.expect()` calls in production code paths (excluding
37-
tests)
38-
- Critical transaction processing paths could panic the node
39-
- Inconsistent error handling across modules
42+
- Extensive use of `.unwrap()` and `.expect()` calls in code paths, particularly
43+
in `scan_state/transaction_logic.rs`, `staged_ledger/staged_ledger.rs`, and
44+
`transaction_pool.rs`
45+
- These calls are generally in code paths with well-understood preconditions but
46+
could benefit from explicit error propagation
47+
- Inconsistent error handling patterns across modules
4048
- Verification key lookup bug fix from upstream Mina Protocol needs to be ported
4149
(https://github.com/MinaProtocol/mina/pull/16699)
4250

4351
**Monolithic Structure**
4452

45-
- Single massive crate with files exceeding 6,000+ lines
46-
- Deep coupling between components that should be independent
47-
- Hard to maintain, test, and develop in parallel
53+
- Large files like `scan_state/transaction_logic.rs` and
54+
`staged_ledger/staged_ledger.rs` mirror OCaml's structure and are difficult to
55+
navigate
56+
- Files contain embedded tests that are hard to discover
57+
- When modifying these files, prefer small targeted changes over major
58+
restructuring
4859

4960
**Performance**
5061

@@ -53,6 +64,7 @@ overview and design details, see
5364
unnecessary deep clones for sparse ledger construction
5465
- Transaction pool operations clone transaction objects with acknowledged TODO
5566
comments about performance
67+
- Performance monitoring infrastructure exists but is disabled
5668
- No memory pooling or reuse strategies (could help with memory fragmentation in
5769
WASM)
5870

@@ -63,6 +75,12 @@ overview and design details, see
6375
comprehensive global solution (see persistence.md)
6476
- Thread-local caching holds memory indefinitely
6577

78+
**Code Organization**
79+
80+
- Multiple TODO/FIXME items throughout the codebase requiring attention
81+
- Incomplete implementations in `sparse_ledger/mod.rs` with unimplemented trait
82+
methods
83+
6684
## Refactoring Plan
6785

6886
**Phase 1: Safety**

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)