Update 2023-01-18.md

Author: santosomar

meeting_minutes/2023/2023-01-18.md

@@ -51,7 +51,8 @@ Note: Observers of this committee that are ready to become Members should follow
 - Thomas Schmidt:  would like to take the one with the best outcome in quickest time.  
 - Starting from scratch from ISO is hard, ITU too but Duncan can help with that process.  
 - Stefan is looking for the approach that would make more sense for the TC.   
-- ITU standards are free and translations into many languages are too. ISO standards are typically behind a paywall. 
+- ITU standards are free and translations into many languages are too. In case we submit CSAF v2.0 to ISO/IEC it will also be free but will not be translated.
+- Stefan mentioned that translations of CSAF may be problematic despite their marketing value.
 - ITU translates the standard in multiple languages and that may be good for awareness and adoption.  
 - ISO references shared during the meeting:
   - https://www.iso.org/standard/81870.html
@@ -61,6 +62,7 @@ Note: Observers of this committee that are ready to become Members should follow
 **Email Threads with Additional Information** from James Bryce Clark, General Counsel, OASIS:
 - https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/csaf/email/archives/202301/msg00005.html
 - https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/csaf/email/archives/202301/msg00004.html
+- https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/csaf/email/archives/202301/msg00003.html
 
 ## Next Steps
 - The TC will decide to go with ITU or ISO during next week's meeting.