Minutes of 2026-01-28 Meeting #540 #2167
Closed
HeikoTheissen
announced in
Minutes
Replies: 1 comment
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Roll call [8:00]
Meeting link
Attendees:
Quorum is achieved (9 out of 9 voting members)
Approve agenda [8:05]
Agenda is approved.
Approve minutes from previous meeting(s) [8:10]
Minutes of 2026-01-21 Meeting #539
Regarding OData 4 Java library #2159, Mike notes that the Microsoft Defender team wanted to contribute to Olingo and are now working on a fork. They did not get much traction while the project was owned by SAP but might now be interested in taking over ownership of the project. Mike will send more information to Heiko.
Minutes are approved.
Issues [8:15]
Issues - OData TC
Extra formatting tool for ABNF links #2130
Christof believes all of the technical issues with the railroad diagrams have been fixed.
Heiko moves to merge the pull request. Christof seconds. No objections, motion passes.
Access a property of the result of a non-composable function #400
TC agrees to the text proposed by Mike. Mike will re-style the hyperlinks in the usual format [OData-VocCap].
It is not clear if the entities in a collection returned by a function always have an entity-id #376
TC agrees to the use case of addressing a collection of non-persisted entities with keys by invoking an operation. TC discusses whether the operation can also be an action with side-effects and what it means for the keys to be stable across invocations. Entities with the same key from different invocations
Mike will create a pull request with a wording that endorses at least the first bullet point: correlation if the action or function parameters are unchanged.
A request
dependsOnanother from a different atomicity group #2150TC reviews pull request Atomicity group of prerequisite requests optional in
dependsOn#2164. The text does not make clear whether a dependency on an atomicity group is equivalent to a dependency on one request from that atomcity group. Mike will propose an alternative wording.Next meetings [9:50]
Wednesday, February 4, 2026, during 8-10 PST (17:00-19:00 CET) - Heiko and perhaps Hubert and George outMike moves to cancel the meeting. Hubert seconds. No objections, motion passes.
AOB and wrap up [9:55]
Meeting is adjourned.
Find these minutes also at Minutes of 2026-01-28 Meeting #540 #2167
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions